Educational institutes should not discourage students on field areas they may be unlikely to succeed
Educational institutions or schools are places where as a young adult we spend about two-thirds of our time. Teachers or Deans who are the people in authority in these institutions tend to have larger influence on us at times even more than our parents. Most people look up to many professors as their mentor or role model. Educational institutions have an aim to groom and support its students in areas in which they have shown some sort of skills or interest so these students can be the best or the ‘crème de la crème’ as the French say, but not to decide for the students, areas where they the teachers think the students are likely to succeed.
In this modern world where passion plays a key factor in success, one must have the interest or passion in an activity or a field of study in order to be successful in it. Most well paid careers of today did not have that status a decade ago for example, actors, musicians and sports athletes of today are more successful than they would have been a decade ago. If Beyonce’s teachers dissuaded her from pursing music I don’t think we would have known of her existence of would have enjoyed her good music.
Let us take the scenario of Lionel Messi, the well renowned Barcelona football star or Ronaldo who plays for Real Madrid. They started football at a very early age when football as a career did not look as lucrative as it is today. Supposing they were discouraged they would probably had not been good at any other thing in life and might have ended up being a burden on the society , homeless or much worse be involved in crime.
Yes, teachers or professors in the various educational institutions have an obligation to dissuade students from certain negative activities such as smoking, alcohol or drug abuse or other negative behaviors that definitely in the long or short term prevents the student from utilizing his or her talent or skills to be the best they could ever be.
Also the fact that a student might not be performing well in a field of study does not mean he or she is never going to succeed at it one day. Everyone has his or her pace of absolving knowledge or being perfect at something. Some have the characteristics of gas stoves which tend to heat as soon as they are lit on. This refers to students who grasp things quick and understand basic and advanced concepts easier. The others are of the electric stove characteristic, taking time to heat up but once they do, they last longer. This is to say that the educational institution is in no position to judge on where students should focus as a field of study because the world is changing and areas of study which do not look so important today, might be at the top of careers in years to come. Secondly students have unequal ways of study or understanding. Educational Institutions should focus on counselling and encouragement so the student in his right state of mind chooses a career path.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...onal institutions or schools are places where as a young adult we spend about two-thirds...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...ey were discouraged they would probably had not been good at any other thing in lif...
^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e ended up being a burden on the society , homeless or much worse be involved in c...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...lls to be the best they could ever be. Also the fact that a student might not be pe...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'well', 'for example', 'sort of', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257894736842 0.229887763892 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.157894736842 0.158761421928 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0789473684211 0.0866891130778 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0473684210526 0.046263068375 102% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0561403508772 0.0685040099705 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119298245614 0.118717715034 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0350877192982 0.0351676179071 100% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.65742203799 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0263157894737 0.0309702414327 85% => OK
Particles: 0.00526315789474 0.00188951952338 279% => OK
Determiners: 0.0842105263158 0.0887237588012 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0210526315789 0.0209618222197 100% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0210526315789 0.0139019557991 151% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2957.0 2387.08602151 124% => OK
No of words: 526.0 408.028673835 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6216730038 5.86048508987 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.48200974243 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.27566539924 0.338922669872 81% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.21102661597 0.251872472559 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.161596958175 0.174417080927 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0874524714829 0.112833075102 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65742203799 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503802281369 0.524397521467 96% => OK
Word variations: 60.3357920576 59.2087087015 102% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.6842105263 20.5533526081 135% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.7874253313 48.84282405 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.631578947 120.699889404 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6842105263 20.5533526081 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.631578947368 0.644075263715 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 48.7868721233 45.7405998639 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.57718120805 1.45489161554 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208375130684 0.300154397459 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0869593016028 0.103427244359 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0579548330147 0.0752933317313 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.501819318624 0.497263757937 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.186015871881 0.151897553556 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775143677393 0.114077575197 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622396033513 0.0781384742642 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.266126802107 0.336927656856 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0401850302043 0.067059652881 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134240406192 0.210909579961 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656018243182 0.0618886996521 106% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.