Even though many people from different countries care about environment problems (pollution and global warming), the environmental situation cannot be improved in the future.
Cleaner environment not only facilities people’ lives, but also gives rise to the question argued recently that if we can believe our governments claiming that they will elevate the quality of environment in the future to a great extent. Some argue that, though governments have cared about environment problems, it is still worthy to believe that environment pollutant would be reduced significantly. However, I hold the totally opposite view.
Admittedly, living in such a world undergoing constant changes, we have found the demand of advanced technology is increasing dramatically. For example, smog hangs over China, especially in winter, as families need central heating to keep warm in room, which means a great number of coals fired; this is unable to avoid. Besides, we have to guarantee the operation of certain industries, providing people’s daily demands, such as packinghouse, automobile manufacturer and so forth. Unfortunately, these industries cause numerous pollutants. That is, seemingly, we could not expect any environment improvement. Yet, it is the case that technology can help human beings cut down environmental pollution.
For starters, technology devices are replacing traditional high-polluting ones. At present, chances are high that the advancement of technology imposes a profound effect on our surroundings, yet chances are also high that it is these high-tech projects that are able to turn the scale. New transportation vehicles serve as a good example. The new transportation vehicles, using only electricity as energy, are more environmental friendly than the conventional fuel-powered vehicles. Nowadays, in the suburb of my hometown Beijing, the new electronic buses have been put into use. Accordingly, the gas stations will be gradually replaced by “electricity stations” if the electric buses can win supports from public. It is foreseeable that the electric buses become more and more popular among societies, which means the using of private cars and public buses discharging tail gas will be reduced in the coming years.
In addition, citizens in increasing numbers are aware of the urgent requirement for a cleaner environment. Automobile businesses, for instance, went through tremendous development over the past century, which has brought convenience to car owners but disasters to our environment. Besides, strong evidence shows that the hole in the Ozone Layer over the Antarctic region has expanded at an alarming rate beyond prediction. We are also told that polar glaciers quickly melt down by serious global warming. In this situation, all individuals need to do is to save energy and maintain ecological balance, having a strong desire to enhance the surroundings. Therefore, it is no common to see incorporating many commuters ride to work even that can afford private cars. Plus, administrators have always buckled down to preserve our environment. Thus, we are supposed to have confidence and believe we will before long witness the cleaner environment significantly.
All in all, though society progressing is responsible for the environment pollutant, we should believe that we will witness a cleaner world undoubtedly in the future because of brilliant technology and individuals’ awareness of conserving the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-10 | Angelina2016 | 95 | view |
- TPO31-integrate writing3 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? There is never a reason to be impolite to others. 90
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- 42 integrated writing 3
- You may choose between two professors who will be teaching a course that you must take at your university. If the following statements are the only information available to you about the differences between the two professors, which professor would you ch 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 708, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eings cut down environmental pollution. For starters, technology devices are rep...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 8.0752688172 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2820.0 1977.66487455 143% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27816045977 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 296.0 212.727598566 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 884.7 618.680645161 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3610878558 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.8 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145362439268 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351828739845 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428252042608 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818209305749 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041778077298 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 10.9000537634 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 160.0 86.8835125448 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.