Food in the past was much healthier than today
With increasing awareness of food safety problems, some people believe that the food today was less healthier than the food in the past. However, I cannot agree with this statement, owing to some reason like without enough the surveillance/supervision for food safety and less well-preserved conditions . They are illuminated as follows.
Admittedly, food safety problems can always be seen in the TV news or social media, which seems to indicate that the food safety problems become more and more serious. However, we cannot get these kinds of messages in such an easy way for the past.
Most importantly, the growing awareness of food safety problems today leads to the strict safety control of food by the administrations or even public opinion. And the quality of food is being pushed forward by those strict safety control of food, which cannot be imagined in the past. The situations in China may shed some light on it. Although some horrible news or rumors about food safety can always be seen in daily life, over 100 new rules or standards for different kinds of food have been set or developed by the administrations in recent years. And the food safety law was published in 2008, after some serious food safety problems were happened like SanLu milk with some chemicals, which leads to the health problem for the infants.
Additionally, the food in the past cannot be preserved well without enough the modern technology like fridge or pre-packaged food. Besides, without well-developed economics, my grandma told me that people in the past had to eat some ill-preserved or bad food to make sure themselves to get full. It is even in the era of peace and it would get much worse during the war time that people will eat everything which can keep their life in any ways.
Simply put, compared with the food in the past, the quality of food today is being well pushed, with the help of the strict supervision for food safety and technologies for food preservations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-15 | hellohello202215 | 66 | view |
| 2022-10-15 | hellohello202215 | 66 | view |
| 2022-10-15 | hellohello202215 | 66 | view |
| 2022-10-15 | hellohello202215 | 76 | view |
| 2022-10-15 | hellohello202215 | 60 | view |
- young people today do not have influence on the important decision for society. 73
- Food in the past was much healthier than today 66
- the best use of time spent with children is playing games or sports. 73
- workers are more satisfied with the numerous different tasks in their jobs rather than with similar tasks 76
- Society benefits more from works of great artists than from political leaders Do you agree or disagree with this statement 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less healthy'?
Suggestion: less healthy
... people believe that the food today was less healthier than the food in the past. However, I c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...afety and less well-preserved conditions . They are illuminated as follows. Admit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, may, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88095238095 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81299690681 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3831644786 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.142857143 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.45110844103 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325032772185 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120073786934 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123223734734 0.0737576698707 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197199860343 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075527792891 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.