A friend is trying to reduce living expenses This person is trying to decide among the following three ways to do this Find a roommate housemate who can share living expenses Buy new technology products such as the latest mobile cell phone Buy less expens

If my friend wants to reduce living expenses, I will recommend not buying new technology products such as the latest mobile. I will tell you three reasons to support my opinion.

First, it is too hard to find a roommate. Living with a roommate is not only physically but mentally difficult. If you live with a stranger, it will be uncomfortable, you would not feel like you are home and you should always be careful. Also, if you live with a close friend, it is comfortable, but if you fight with that friend, the relationship becomes too ambiguous and privacy is lost. Even if there is something uncomfortable, it may be hard to say because we are friends. For example, my friend shared a room with a close friend in the dormitory. However, she had a big fight with that friend and since then she moved the room and lost her friend.

Second, food does not help much to reduce money. Nowadays, we have to buy various ingredients to eat one food, so making it at home is more expensive than buying it outside. In particular, living alone costs more for ingredients and is a waste of food. For instance, I used to make Kimbap at home to save money, but it cost more than buying it outside. Also, I think it is not desirable to save money on food, because we work hard and study hard to eat delicious food.

Last, not buying new technology products is most easy to realize. These days, science and technology are so advanced that new electronic devices are being created every year. But, as fast as this is developing, people are wasting a ton of money trying to throw away their old gadgets and buy new ones. There is no problem with what products we used before, therefore, it is sufficiently feasible to handle electronic devices well and not be interested in new ones. It is also very helpful to protect the environment.

This is why I recommend reducing money on not buying new technology products.
This is the best and most feasible way.

Votes
Average: 8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i think, in particular, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5754985755 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59718762514 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509971509972 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4117343504 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.4761904762 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7142857143 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253411675255 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765087505732 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721956970265 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145812409161 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550632888163 0.0645574589148 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 11.7677419355 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.