A government spends money on all adults after 25-year-old on a training course for the most up-to-date skills at workplace. Do you think it is effective? Why or why not?
The development of our society raises the demand for employees with a wider range of skills and techniques. Therefore, the government decides to set up a training course for all adults after 25-year-old to acquire the most up-to-date skills. I believe this method is totally effective.
Someone may argue that it will be too money-consuming for the government, which has already been choked with heavy financial burdens and its limited tax revenues need to cover considerable things like infrastructure, medical care, and education. It seems that adding up an extra program for so many people can be too costly for the government to afford, and the government may have to cut down expenses in some more important areas. However, this program does offer a long-lasting profit. If more adults have a better grasp of the latest skills, they will help the companies and factories to produce more attracting and high-tech products. Thus, those employees and companies can make more money and it will boost the whole economy subsequently. As time goes by, the extra tax they paid will definitely cover up these expenses, and they can make more contributions to society.
Also, it will encourage workers to dedicate themselves to working by easing their pressure. As it is known to all, robots and AI are gradually replace human beings in several vocations. Therefore, many people worry that they will lose their jobs in the near future, which leads to some stress-related illnesses, like insomnia and depression. Under such circumstances, there is no wonder that they are absent-minded now and then while they are at work. If there is an opportunity that they can learn the latest techniques for free, they will very likely to attend these courses and listen carefully. Meanwhile, they can easily perfect the skills they learn by exerting in the workplace and thus, the company will benefit from their learning very soon. And when they are experienced enough, they will be confident to complete the required tasks.
Furthermore, it will expand its knowledge scope. Before attending this course, they are restricted to out-dated views towards society and they may not have enough approach to learn something new. That means they lack the abilities of innovation, which is of vital significance nowadays. For example, Nokia is a world-famous company that mainly produces mobile phones. Nevertheless, they stuck to their old-fashioned designs decades ago and failed to catch up with other firms on smartphones. Therefore, they lost many shares in the market and are quite vulnerable now. If the employees and leaders are trained with such a program, the corporation will be able to lead the fashion of the whole realm and strengthen its advantages.
In sum, the government should attach more importance to such a training course since it will allow employees to fully express their talents and contribute a lot to society.
- Students in a university club want to help others, but they can only choose one project a year, which one of the following is the best?1)help those students in a nearby primary school with reading and mathematics2)help people who cannot afford to build or 73
- It’s the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside of the school. 90
- Whether to take a gap year? 90
- It is commonly believed that in life success is not the most important thing it is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail 90
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 144, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'replaced'.
Suggestion: replaced
...own to all, robots and AI are gradually replace human beings in several vocations. Ther...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2462.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18315789474 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83007199188 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3871839341 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.583333333 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7916666667 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.20833333333 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14374025967 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433842545479 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870012597368 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11434409887 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112726673006 0.0645574589148 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 86.8835125448 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.