Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that attention to sports and athletes have a lot of social, political and economic benefits for countries. Thus, most people encourage their governments to invest more in this potential high-profit portion. Contrary, to this popular belief, there are still those who argue that art is the symbol of the cultural values of each society, so arts need more financial support for more flourish and progress. However, I, to a great extent, disagree with this idea that governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics.
First and foremost, professional sports are the source of entertainment for all people in society. A wide range of citizens include highly educated people, workers, women, men and children love sports teams. Athletes impress their audience and provide happiness and positive atmosphere in society. For example, during the football world cup, people feelings and behavior chance completely. All people are excited and seriously follow news and anticipate the success of their favorite team.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that investment in support and improvement of athletics will motivate common people to start sports activities. People get professional athletes as an example of power, fitness and health, therefore encouraged to participate more in these sets of activities. Whereby, the obesity rate and heart illness caused by lack of exercise will decrease significantly.
Finally, yet importantly, the main reason for recent years depression in arts is not the lack of money. Unfortunately, today young artists forget the value of fine art and just try to make more profit as possible. For example, when we are going to an art gallery, it is very rare to find appropriate artwork. Most people, especially wealthy ones spend a considerable amount of money to buy artworks. However, weakness in style, quality and lack of new ideas put arts in difficulty, not lack of government financial support.
On the basis of reasons that were mentioned above, I am convinced that it is better governments spend more money in support of athletics than arts. Because of widespread happiness caused by professional sports, and remarkable health improvement caused by spots, and also the roots of difficulty for toady art is not a poor budget.
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 61
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellow students or co workers than from those at a higher level such as teachers or supervisors 48
- People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow students or co workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors. 73
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...importantly, the main reason for recent years depression in arts is not the lack of m...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.328 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84984210089 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2968683279 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.157894737 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7368421053 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331634396384 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09208783581 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112944390536 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180075324089 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104365367035 0.0645574589148 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.