For hiring a person which one do you choose?
1- Checking their social media
2- Asking their former employer
3- Hiring them as an apprentice for one month
Different characters are important when people want to decide to hire others as their co-workers, and people can collect information about those features in distinctive methods. In this regard, some people believe that controlling others’ social media account is the best way of understanding about their abilities, while some others think that getting information from their former employers can be better; still others suppose that recruiting them as an apprentice for one month is the best way to be familiar with their skills. As far as I am concerned, I believe that the third idea carries more weight, and I have enough reasons to feel that way. I will illustrate two of which in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, I personally should consider people’s abilities since I do not have trust to their allegation in their social media or to their former employer’s recommendations. To put it in a more vivid picture, as I almost always need some special abilities for my work, I try to see people’s disparate abilities in person. It is due to the fact that some people may be considered as useful ones by their former employers since they have some related skills while those abilities are not practical in my business. As a result, I have to recruit people as an apprentice for one or two months in order to perceive their usefulness. Take one my previous employee as a way of illustration. I had hired him according to his resume in his social media account and his former employer’s suggestions. Having started his work in my company, he did not reveal any talent in my business or even none of which he claimed about himself in his social media account or his former employer’s recommendations.
Secondly, another quality which is really significant for me is my personal’s personalities, and I cannot understand it unless I be connected with them at least for one month. To clarify this point, people often demonstrate their real personality in life difficulties, and when I examine them for one month, I can find out whether they can keep up with my criteria or not. Take some of my employees in my company, for instance. I always make a contract with them for one month in order to be familiar with their personalities. In addition, I try to detect them in difficulties during that month to see how they cope with them. After I find them as a qualified one, I hire them permanently.
To sum up, all things considered, I firmly believe that hiring people for one month as an apprentice is the best method to understand that whether they are appropriate for my work or not. Given that not only can I see their skills in person, but also I can be cognizant of their personalities.
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parent s jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parent s job 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Governments need to spend money on beautiful things more than on practical things 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s better complete a project and then start another one than to do several things at the same time 68
- TPO 55 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, still, third, while, at least, for instance, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 84.0 43.0788530466 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2247.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 469.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79104477612 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94980689127 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462686567164 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 706.5 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1308731005 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.263157895 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6842105263 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446471761885 0.236089414692 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14624167329 0.076458572812 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871804461645 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295533877441 0.150856017488 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327238360498 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.