Pollution is one of the major problems that the world is dealing with. There are many types of pollution. However, air pollution is one of the most problematic ones of all the other types. Worldwide, it has been spreading and increasing dramatically. It is also one of the major reasons for global warming, which is another major problem. Nevertheless, I would not go back to some time and place to live with less pollution.
The first reason for this choice is, if I were to go back to that time, it would be time very far away from today. Everything in that world would be so different. For example, the technology we have today would not be available. In the past, people were wasting a lot of time and energy, just to do very simple things. They were dealing with other things such as hunger and illnesses before there was pollution. Technology helped people to overcome these problems.
Secondly, not only the technology but also the cultures, beliefs, and opinions of people change as time passes. All the things that have shaped my mind for all these years were affected by the time and environment I lived in. I would tend to judge the world around me so much more than today and people from that time would judge me as well. It is even possible not to understand each other because of language differences. It would be even more difficult since I would be isolated from my family and friends. I do not think that I could adapt to all these changes.
Overall, I would not go back to some time and place to live with less pollution because everything would be so different than the world I am currently living in that I could not adapt. I would be separated from my family and I could not benefit from technology. So it would be a whole new world for me.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ecause everything would be so different than the world I am currently living in that...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48101661881 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472049689441 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6101134793 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.0 100.406767564 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296057836961 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895911674868 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141237309418 0.0737576698707 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203977672599 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882581504873 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 11.7677419355 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.23 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.93 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.