If you need to take a course, which professor’s course would like to take
A professor who was voted the most popular
A professor who had just won an award for an outstanding research
Generally speaking, choosing a course in university can be based on various factors, one of which is the professor aiming to teach these courses. Some students who are not detriment in their studies may want to take a course with someone popular among students; however, others prefer to be taught by someone who is awarded for excellent research. From my viewpoint, I personally believe that educating under the supervision of someone receiving an award in his field can be more beneficial for students. There are some reasons to illustrate this, two of which will be elucidated in the following paragraphs.
Taking a course with a professor who is popular, sometimes can have bad effects on students’ academic progress. Because sometime professor popularity is based on some students’ opinions which may be foul and can distract students' minds. For example, sometimes some professors are popular for their easiness on students' grades. So students who do not want to challenge themselves in being at class that requires more studying will take the class even with knowing that they will not learn the course profoundly. Whereas taking a course with someone who has been making a lot of effort to pushing back the frontiers of the knowledge, will be more helpful for students not only for their academic program but also for the future.
So taking a course with a professor who won an award should be considered as a privilege to the students. Since the professor has been researching in his field for a long time, so he is informed with different aspects of the given course, and as a result, the students will learn the course more efficiently. Also since the professor has been faced with many obstacles for reaching the climax of his work, students can gain a lot of good advice which can help them to find their way to success. Back then when I was in college I remember I used to have a course with one of the top professors who had accomplished some brilliant works in his field. Due to his success, he was a pioneer in his way of teaching. For teaching more effectively, he preferred to be a guide on the side rather than a sage on the stage. He helped us to increase our intellectual ability which was beneficial for us to solve many problems
- Some companies provide important products or service but also damage environment Some people believe that government should require more penalty higher tax and larger fine of these companies while others believe that there are better ways Which do you pre 73
- One can learn a lot about a person from the books and movies that he likes 70
- It is difficult for a teacher to be both popular and effective in helping students in learning 70
- Some companies provide important products or service but also damage environment Some people believe that government should require more penalty higher tax and larger fine of these companies while others believe that there are better ways Which do you pre 75
- Providing internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer internet access to all of their citizens at no cost 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...can gain a lot of good advice which can help them to find their way to success. Back then when I ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, whereas, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76530612245 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70369173161 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487244897959 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4682237942 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339873969638 0.236089414692 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13246664373 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940973020288 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254784809659 0.150856017488 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176273875865 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.