Without a shadow of a doubt, mentors play a pivotal role in fostering motivation in their pupils. An unanswered question in this area is that students should consider which characteristics before enrolling in their classes. Despite the arguments asserting that previous students’ comments are good criteria for current students’ decisions, I believe otherwise, maintaining that students must take a course taught by a well-known professor in the scientific community as a noble researcher. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my point of view through two compelling reasons.
The first exquisite point corroborating my stance on this subject is that class productivity is attributed to its mentors. More specifically, a knowledgeable professor fully comprehends the concept and usage of issues due to their personal research and experience. Consequently, their students can understand the course as well as they did. These educators can accurately answer students’ questions during class time or introduce an excellent source to them. Besides, seldom are time been dissipated in these courses, and neither professors nor their students talk about trivial matters. On the whole, they persuade their pupils to do their projects and assignment eagerly and punctually. For example, had I not got a course with strict and distinguished teachers, I would never have noticed the difference between excellent and ordinary classes.
Another prominent motive to be mentioned is that those students having taken classes with an international well-recognized professor are more likely to be successful in the future. Employees are looking for students with impressive academic, personal, and skills. In this regard, one of the vital requirements for applying for a profession is a letter of recommendation. Similarly, students need inference letters to attend reputable educational institutions. Superficially, given avoiding loss the reliability, expert teachers merely recommend high skill and diligent students. Furthermore, the circumstance of their class, with a heavy workload and challenging exams, provides their pupils an opportunity to demonstrate their ability, cleverness, and conscientiousness. One of my university surveys revealed that most department alumni that all educators are famous in their field succeeded in academic and professional lives.
Reflecting upon all the grounds mentioned above, one soon realizes that the most important characteristic that should be considered is the lecturer’s curriculum vitae.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends 76
- In many places students aged 12 18 are typically taught different subjects by different teachers while younger students are usually taught by only one teacher all day long However it would also benefit younger students to be taught by several different 76
- Do you agree or disagree It is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than doing physical exercise Explain your answer with examples and specific reasons 76
- Students in a university club want to help others but they can only choose one project a year which one of the following is the best help those students in a nearby primary school with reading and mathematics help people who cannot afford to build or rent 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important ways to improve the people s health is to clean the environment 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'seldom' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are seldom
...e an excellent source to them. Besides, seldom are time been dissipated in these courses, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 848, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...between excellent and ordinary classes. Another prominent motive to be mentioned...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, similarly, so, well, for example, as well as, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87331536388 4.8611393121 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32605599533 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630727762803 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6993062617 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.684210526 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5263157895 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154807178982 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419362244904 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374656039066 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863909288134 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398300842746 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 11.7677419355 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 10.9000537634 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.01818996416 130% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 86.8835125448 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.