If you need to take a course, which professor's course would you like to take?
1. a professor who was voted the most popular
2. a professor who has just won an award for an outstanding research
The quality of university education depends primarily on its teaching standards. And I believe that taking a course taught by the most popular professor can benefit students more.
First, attending a course taught by a well-received professor allows students to learn better. Typically, academic content can be dry, and many students would find it hard to focus in class, especially during warm afternoons. And missing examples or explanations of key concepts while having their minds drifting away might cause them trouble because most of the exam questions come from the materials covered in class. However, if a professor is loved by the students, attending classes given by this professor would most likely be enjoyable since other students have enjoyed the teaching to have voted for the professor in the first place. And with more enjoyment during classes, students can better focus on what the professor is talking about, thus building lasting memories about their learning contents and ultimately helping them learn more effectively.
Second, a professor who has won research awards might teach inadequately. Winning such an award requires long-term devotion to the field researched. And spending more time doing something would inevitably mean spending less time on other things, such as teaching or developing interpersonal skills. Therefore, with fewer hours for teaching activities, a professor might not be so familiar with students’ strengths and weaknesses. And this means this professor might emphasize trivial points too much or not explain intricate ideas fully. Either of these impedes students’ learning. Besides, spending too much time conducting research lowers the amount of time for the professor to socialize, likely developing not-so-sophisticated personal skills. So, students might not communicate with this person well. And when they have problems with their studies, they might be reluctant to talk to this professor who is always so busy with the research project.
To conclude, attending a well-received professor’s course enables students to learn more attentively, while a professor who immerses in research might teach poorly.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People can learn as much by watching movies as they can learn by reading books Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Some people think having classes on the Internet is good while others think having classes with a teacher in the classroom is good Which one do you prefer and why 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Many people nowadays spend too much money on their pets dogs cats or other animals although there are better uses for their money 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Many people nowadays spend too much money on their pets dogs cats or other animals although there are better uses for their money 83
- Imagine that a professor wants students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of time Is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or is it better to require students to work alone Why Use specifi 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ived professor allows students to learn better. Typically, academic content can be dry...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, such as, talking about, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6170212766 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90587681525 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577507598784 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6910430791 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.705882353 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64705882353 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280094280205 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970424659322 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920984012588 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190112176688 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248418073102 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.