Imagine that a professor requires students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of life Is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or is it better to require students to work alone

With the improvement of the technology, the education system has changed a lot and professors use different methods of learning for teaching the students. Sometimes, it happens that professors ask students to learn about something as much as possible in a short time and I am of the opinion that, it would be more beneficial for students if their professor requires them to work together in a group. I feel this way because of some reasons which I will explain more in the following essay:
First of all, if students have this opportunity to work in a group, they could use better of their time. Because they could divide different parts of the subject between each other, then each of the students would have enough time to fundamentally focus on the assigned part and on the specific day they could share their knowledge and learnt materials with each other. By this way, as students have to explain learnt materials to each other, it would help them to learn more because people would learn better if somebody explain them instead of studying individually.

Another reason drives me to indicate is that, when students are working in a group, whenever they face a question or a problem, they could ask each other and in that case they could find the best answers and solutions because it is obvious that the output of many brains is much more effective than one brain. For instance, when students are working on a physics question, if they work together they would find the best and more practical solution for that, while if a student try to solve the question alone, he may not consider all solutions to find the best one.
Admittedly, it is obvious that another important effect of working together is that students would learn how to work properly as a team member which is very significant skill and mandatory for the future career life of students.

To draw my conclusion, according to the above reasons, if students work together in a group, further than using more beneficially of their time, they could learn more and they would have this chance to think together on the faced problems and question, hence they could help each other while they are practicing how to be a team member.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill explain more in the following essay: First of all, if students have this oppo...
^^^
Line 2, column 504, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...o learn more because people would learn better if somebody explain them instead of stu...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 523, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'somebody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
...e people would learn better if somebody explain them instead of studying individually. ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, may, so, then, while, for instance, i feel, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77748691099 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49936945531 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458115183246 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 20.1344086022 209% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.717367355 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 202.777777778 100.406767564 202% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 42.4444444444 20.6045352989 206% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.45110844103 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311480413184 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156544014129 0.076458572812 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119890512984 0.0737576698707 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191684623848 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902357537927 0.0645574589148 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.3 11.7677419355 190% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.77 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.1575268817 170% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.0537634409 187% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.247311828 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200

Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.