Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away; 2. Wait until the class or the meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or the meeting leader; 3. Say nothing
People have always tried to avoid themselves from the mistakes to show others that they do not have problems in life. But, in some cases, the leader of a company or the teacher of a class will say something wrong that we can understand it, and our habit in this situation is so important. That is a controversial issue in which people talk to each other to know about, which reaction is true. In my opinion, waiting until the class or the meeting finishes and correct it after that is better than other ideas. In the following paragraphs, I will explore into the most conspicuous reasons and examples justifying my viewpoint.
To begin with, the teacher's mistake will solve privately. Everyone especially a teacher or a boss of a company has a specific prestige among others. Interrupting and correct his or her mistake between the speeches is a detrimental decision because with this reaction from us, his or her value will reduce and anyone cannot trust his or her words. Consequently, talking to them in private is an efficient solution for this matter. My own experience as a student demonstrates evidence of this. When I was in high school, I took a Geography class. I had enormous information from a variety of countries in the world because that was my interest. After a while, my teacher began to talk about African countries. He told the wrong data in the class, and that was a crucial moment in the class that I had to decide to interrupt and correct or wait until the class finished. I waited, and after the time of the class, I said to my teacher that he was giving incorrect information about that topic to the students. He appreciated me for my beautiful reaction to his mistake.
Secondly, by interrupting the conversation, people will stop the meeting for a moment, and speakers will lose their word. This is a bad circumstance that when someone is talking about something with lots of energy, suddenly, someone interrupts his speech. In this situation, it can impact on that meeting, and even on listeners because their mind will deviate for a second. As a result, this habit can influence the meeting, which is a constitution from speakers and listeners.
To sum up, waiting until the end of the conversation is an appropriate solution for this specific situation. first, we can keep the worth of the speakers among other people, second, we do not make a stop in the discussion, and no one loses the topic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
... mistake will solve privately. Everyone especially a teacher or a boss of a company has a sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...e solution for this specific situation. first, we can keep the worth of the speakers ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, talking about, as a result, in my opinion, in some cases, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73349056604 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76385712264 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497641509434 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4480356214 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2272727273 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.40909090909 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211494119173 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573831907938 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525884575756 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121436664564 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590286368022 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.