Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
— Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
— Say nothing.
Making mistakes in speech is an unavoidable occurrence that may happen in every speech and every time. The important aspect is how we face it and show a reaction to this event. Among the options that are everyone depends on his/her preference will choose one way. I strongly prefer to wait until the end of the meeting or class and then talk about the errors in speaking. In the following, I will cogently elaborate on my points of view.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that waiting show are respect to the speaker. I firmly believe interrupting someone during the speech shows our rude behavior, because it might happen for everyone. Besides, the speaker perhaps feels embarresing in front of the great abundance of the audience. To clarify this point of view more, for example in the academician speech which holds in the big halls with lots of audiences from different universities of the world undoubtedly interrupting the speaker disturb the discipline of the conference.
Another noteworthy point in corroborating this issue involves forgetness. The speaker miss his/her balance and the train of the thoughts will be broken. Hence it has very terrible effect on the quality of the conference or the meeting. According to the study that conducted in this issue, it prooved waiting untile the end of the speech not only help to the speaker, but also provide the better situation for audience to listen carefully. However, some prefer not to say any things, I strongly disagree with this opinion. The speaker never understand his/her mistakes so continues to do it, and in some conditions it tarnishes his reputation. Psycologist firmly believe that if we did not warn our mistakes to eachother after some tears it would be changed to part of our habits and versatiled in our behaviors.
In brief, all the aforementioned reason lead us in the conclusion that it is greatly reasonable we consider the balane behavior to help the speakers and also the discipline of our meeting.
- TPO 43 integrated writing 71
- TPO 46 integrated writing 81
- TPO 45 integrated writing 73
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass window 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e train of the thoughts will be broken. Hence it has very terrible effect on the qual...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, then, for example, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 335.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97014925373 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76109560131 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567164179104 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0442511056 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9411764706 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101457098167 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302926232256 0.076458572812 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380326029032 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0558543894514 0.150856017488 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239517523638 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.