Imagine you could improve the town where you live by changing one important thing about it. Which of the following would you choose to do?
• Build additional parks
• Construct more libraries
• Improve public transportation
There is no shortage of opinion on whether the town where people live has to change in some area. In my opinion, If I forced to choose from these options, I would definitely prefer to improve the public transportation system in my town. I feel this for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, in my local town the traffic jam is a highly debated topic for everyone who uses public transport in their daily life. As far as I concerned that having a reliable system of transportation is essential to save time to local inhabitants and they can spend their time with their family or friends instead of trapping in traffic congestion. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my parents’ experience. They use buses on their daily basis so they almost spend 3 hours for an average per day in the traffic jam. As matter of fact, I have a chance to meet my family in our dinner time but nowadays expanding transportation usage and lacking good regularity in traffic, they even can’t come at home for their arrival usual time which a mere opportunity to make a discussion and spend time with their families. As a result, the relationship between couples and families is weakening it may lead to an increase of divorced population number in the local town. This example demonstrates how poor public transportation can affect people's life easily and adversely.
Secondly, Making an advancement on the transportation system attracts many tourists from overseas because of external views and perfect public services such as buses and metros which people often use them so it definitely has an impact on the economy of the whole country, not just only in town. Drawing from my experience, I really love traveling around the world because it gives me a great deal of pleasure from my life. Interestingly, Two years ago I traveled to France with my best friend and when we got off the plane, we decided to use metro instead of catching a taxi because we wanted to know local’ life more intensely. Then I completely attracted to the view and structure of the metro station and it was the best architecture I have ever seen before. Since that time, I really desire to visit again in France due to this satisfaction with their transportation regularity and astonishment of this country.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that having a perfect transport system is demanding to towns. This is because it saves a great deal of time which enables to spend invaluable moments with their family and friends instead of jamming in the traffic and because it appeals a lot of strangers from all over the world on account of good services and view of design.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-28 | Mariam Riyadh | 60 | view |
- Chevalier's memoir TPO8 3
- TPO 30. THE BURNING MIRROR 83
- The reading states that dinosaurs were endotherms and author provides reasons threef support. However, the professor explains that dinosaurs were not actually an endothers animal and refutes each of the author's reasons.First of all, the articles cl 80
- tpo27 80
- tpo7 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, then, as to, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2254.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77542372881 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79923797958 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516949152542 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.6773086136 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.588235294 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7647058824 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0934598335474 0.236089414692 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374696621312 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422117161861 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0778245479043 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070716346077 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.