Nowadays, with increasing life complexity, many individuals prefer to study, for they believe that getting a promotion in education helps them to be in a better position. However, some of them claim that the quality of education must be improved. For this purpose, decision-makers decide to enhance university professors’ salaries. I, personally, agree with this idea because of several conspicuous reasons which will be elaborated as follows.
First of all, increasing university professors’ salaries have a positive effect on their teaching behavior. It is crystal clear that everyone wants to be acclaim at their particular job, and for brings them to work better. In this situation, as university professors gain more money, they spend more time teaching their students. Also, they transfer their knowledge eagerly which has a direct effect on the quality of education. An example of this is the comparison between university professors in Iran and Australia. According to Google, the salary in Australia is much more than Iran; therefore, a lot of educated Iranian individuals have migrated to Australia.
Secondly, it can be a good model for undergraduate students, in which they think that as they study better, they can be a professor. If decision-makers put this job as a career with apex salary, individuals put more weight in this job rather than other job positions. Therefore, it leads society to improve the quality of education and study harder. The results can be seen in Iran. As administers decided to increase the professors’ salaries, a good connection between industry and universities appeared, which assists students to study in better condition with more equipment. Consequently, universities decision-makers should enhance professors’ salary.
All in all, there are several remarkable reasons to support the idea that spending more money on university professors’ salaries has a positive impact on the quality of education. I, personally, agree with the topic and approved my viewpoint in the aforesaid paragraphs.
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside the school. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to take risks and explore new things when you are older than when you are young 73
- For schools, assessing teachers’ teaching efficiency is a very important issue. But is it better for other teachers to assess or let students assess teachers? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 668, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...should enhance professors' salary. All in all, there are several remarkable...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 316.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56962025316 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31414186363 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525316455696 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5725991584 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7777777778 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284585312526 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917946947278 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877737757389 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189637827636 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746519956165 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 58.1214874552 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.