Independent 43 Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do 1 Interrupt and correct the mistake right away 2 wait until c

There are varieties of situations we may confront in daily life, in which one of the most awkward situations must be to correct others. From my own perspective, I prefer to wait until the class, meeting or stuff like that is over and talk to teacher or leader in private. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will illuminate in the following essay.

First of all, it is the most efficient manner to disscuss about rightness of contradictory opinions. To begin with, most students might leave the classroom after class, for example, the disscussion will not supercede others' class time. Furthermore, the formance of a mature thought and a way of articulate expression require time. It seems impossible to figure out everything clearly in such a short moment. Therefore, I have a tendency to think twice before speaking it loundly, which has given me a reputation of unimpeachable logics. Finally, the vital part of expressing privately is that we could provide more reaction time to others, which could offer them an opportunity to rethink about their speech and make a possitive feedback, regardless of whether or not they are going to correct their previous opinions. In one word, efficiency. Only in this way can we save precious time and catch the rare chance to find meaningful conclusion.

Secondly, we could learn something from interpersonal communication with someone superior to us. When someone is releasing a speech, it means he is professional in his field or he is famous. As a result, it is not sensible to make him embarassed in public. Imagine that, if we ignore others' dignity and directly throw our challenging thoughts on his face, the endless of denial and argument would follow right after it, which are meaningless and time-wasting. In fact, we could learn a lot from those people who are expert in their fields; and the incorrect part of their expression could become a perfect beginning of an inspiring conversation and a invaluable chance to access them.

In conclusion, I would choose to wait for a appropriate time before talking about others' errors. This is because it will boost efficiency of interactions; and because we should choose a wise approach to turn an embarassing situation into a marvellous opportunity that allows us to acquire more understandings.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ake a possitive feedback, regardless of whether or not they are going to correct their previou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 650, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...inning of an inspiring conversation and a invaluable chance to access them. I...
^
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... conclusion, I would choose to wait for a appropriate time before talking about o...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, talking about, as a result, first of all, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01566579634 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95479696069 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592689295039 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8437215109 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.722222222 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2777777778 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.45110844103 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110566439165 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030375441926 0.076458572812 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406608099541 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706840139273 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568868091636 0.0645574589148 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ake a possitive feedback, regardless of whether or not they are going to correct their previou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 650, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...inning of an inspiring conversation and a invaluable chance to access them. I...
^
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... conclusion, I would choose to wait for a appropriate time before talking about o...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, talking about, as a result, first of all, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01566579634 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95479696069 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592689295039 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8437215109 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.722222222 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2777777778 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.45110844103 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110566439165 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030375441926 0.076458572812 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406608099541 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706840139273 0.150856017488 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568868091636 0.0645574589148 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.