The early bird vs the night owl
"The early bird always catches the worm" that is a very often used proverb. Experts debate about this circumstance these days when it comes to the new "Dalton plan" for schools, which was established a month ago at a school near Stuttgart. That plan integrates special flextime for the students a method where you can decide at which time you start your work. This special flextime has fully established at our working placements and it works very well. Here the people have the chance to decide whether to get up early to start the day's work or later. Starting the day by getting up early in the morning is preferable because it is better for the work, the health and the social life.
First of all, when you are an early riser you are more productive especially when it comes to work. We all know that feeling when you wake up early in the morning you are more motivated and work gets easier. Another huge factor is that early risers are better structured than others for that they are very good at planning their days and also their work.
Secondly, getting up early in the morning is better for the health. Researchers found out that it is better for the human biorhythm when you start the day early as when you stand up very late. People are more concentrated and more fit in the early hours while later risers are often tired the whole day. Besides, early risers have more energy than others. Another factor is that they have regular and structured eating hours what is better for the body and the human system. Although they have more time for doing sports and regular workouts we all know that is the best for our health.
Thirdly, starting your day early influences your social life in a positive way. People who start their days very early finish their regular working day earlier, too. That means they have more free time for family and friends who probably have the same working hours. They also have more free time for their hobbies. All in all, they are social and emotional balanced because they can use their time more effective.
In conclusion, when it comes to the question if you should start your day early or if you might get up later you better choose the first option. When you get up early you are better at work. It is also better for your health conditions and for your social competencies. So getting your alarm at an early hour because the early bird is better than the night owl.
- TOEFL essay:What do you consider to be the most important room in a house? Why is this room more important to you than any other room? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 66
- Independent writing (question 2)Some people prefer to get up early in the morning and start the day’s work. Others prefer to get up later in the day and work until late at night. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your cho 70
- 118 Some people enjoy change and they look forward to new experiences Others like their lives to stay the same and they do not change their usual habits Compare these two approaches to life Which approach do you prefer Explain why 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 62, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r day early influences your social life in a positive way. People who start their days very early...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 146, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ter you better choose the first option. When you get up early you are better at work...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'well', 'while', 'in conclusion', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.197556008147 0.229887763892 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.148676171079 0.158761421928 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0977596741344 0.0866891130778 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0875763747454 0.046263068375 189% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0896130346232 0.0685040099705 131% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0977596741344 0.118717715034 82% => OK
Participles: 0.030549898167 0.0351676179071 87% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.18602267913 2.67179642975 82% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0122199592668 0.0309702414327 39% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0162932790224 0.00188951952338 862% => Less particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0977596741344 0.0887237588012 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0081466395112 0.0209618222197 39% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0325865580448 0.0139019557991 234% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2483.0 2387.08602151 104% => OK
No of words: 442.0 408.028673835 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61764705882 5.86048508987 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.260180995475 0.338922669872 77% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.169683257919 0.251872472559 67% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.101809954751 0.174417080927 58% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0610859728507 0.112833075102 54% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18602267913 2.67179642975 82% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.411764705882 0.524397521467 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.7933079987 59.2087087015 76% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6684587814 116% => OK
Sentence length: 18.4166666667 20.5533526081 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8621486974 48.84282405 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.458333333 120.699889404 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 20.5533526081 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.541666666667 0.644075263715 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.5376344086 132% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 35.3849924585 45.7405998639 77% => OK
Elegance: 1.0 1.45489161554 69% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406426618376 0.300154397459 135% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.165271299301 0.103427244359 160% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.12277867521 0.0752933317313 163% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.542803528705 0.497263757937 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.151697971092 0.151897553556 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154119929743 0.114077575197 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997264788241 0.0781384742642 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.302521804031 0.336927656856 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0937901001449 0.067059652881 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256431178199 0.210909579961 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894078947557 0.0618886996521 144% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8870967742 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 18.0 8.42114695341 214% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.4623655914 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 21.0 13.6433691756 154% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 21 Out of 30