Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Many people nowadays spend too much money on their pets (dogs, cats, or other animals), although there are better uses for this money.Use specific reasons and example
Being a multi-task or a single task person, has always been one of the heated debate between sociologists all around the world. It is really important for governments to have access to employees who are able to do their job as precise as possible. As far as the quality of doing a job is concerned, many people are of the opinion that it would be better for people to learn a lot of specialty, paving the way for having a better country. Others, nevertheless, possess the exactly opposite point of view and support being single-task people. I, personally, subscribe to the latter idea, and in what follows I will delve into my beliefs.
The first reason that comes to mind is that people can allot less time to each of their job, culminating in having a superficial knowledge about their expertise. There is a well-known proverb in this regard which states, "Jack of all trades and master of none." By bearing the meaning of this proverb in mind, it is not hard to find out that it would be hard for an individual to be a master in a lot of works owing to the limitation of time. On the other hand, people who are able to allocate all of their time to a specific field of interest, and become a specialist, can easily manage their time for being a superb expert in their jobs. In addition, whenever they encounter a problem, they have enough time to looking for a solution for above-mentioned problem, thereby resolving the problem. As a concluding remark on this statement, the more people have time to spend to a time, the more they are able to find the solution of prospective problems, and the more chance they have to be a master in their domains.
Another equally important reason that is noteworthy of mentioning is that by doing a lot of work simultaneously, people cannot have a decent concentration on their tasks. Put differently, during working on a specific subject, these people's mind could fly to other problems of their parallel job, cluttering up their mind with a lot of information. As a result, the likelihood of making mistakes would surge dramatically, leading to waste of a big deal of time. Therefore, they can focus on none of their tasks and the quality of their works will drip extremely. An example of my own life brings this fact home in a proper manner. Studying in university, I decided to have a part-time job in line with my discipline. Thereafter, I was obsessed with a lot of anxiety about the quality of work and study. When I was working in my workplace, I was thinking about upcoming exam and my lack of knowledge for it. As a consequence, I found myself in a situation that failed my exam and had a low quality of work in my job. Had I done one of my tasks single-mindedly, I would have not failed in my exam and would have shown a better quality of work in my workplace.
To sum up, with all this taken into account, I strongly believe that people should perform one task at the same time. By doing so, not only are they able to allocate much time to their specialty, paving the way for becoming an expert, but they also can relieve their minds of undue thought about their parallel work, leading to the increase of their work's quality. I suggest people, especially the young, opt for only one task, paving the way for doing that job splendidly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun specialty seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of specialties'.
Suggestion: a lot of specialties
... it would be better for people to learn a lot of specialty, paving the way for having a better cou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 610, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper manner" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...le of my own life brings this fact home in a proper manner. Studying in university, I decided to h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, well, in addition, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 99.0 52.1666666667 190% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2706.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 595.0 407.700716846 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54789915966 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93888872473 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72123417918 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450420168067 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 859.5 618.680645161 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.2257439763 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.652173913 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8695652174 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4347826087 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180438139691 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587310411711 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384624152811 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125362299687 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180274283313 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.