It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different their parents’ job.
The answer to this question can be varied from person to person. In my opinion, the benefits of choosing a job which is similar to my parents’ job clearly outweigh choosing a different job from my parents’ job. There are some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason coming to my mind is that if people choose a job which is similar to their parents, it is more likely to become prosperous in their lives. As a matter of fact, they are familiar with various aspects of this job, and they can solve the probable problems easily by using their ancestors' experience. In addition, since they this job passed from each generation in their family, they do not need to spend a hoard of money to attract customers. Actually, they are well-known without any advertisements. An example will illustrate this viewpoint much better. I have a friend who his ancestors have a famous restaurant named "Akbar Joje". All of their family members do not choose a different job because they are skillful enough in this job and also they do not need and advertising because most people in our country at least on time tasted their food. Subsequently, they just add a new branch of Akbar Joje in the different city of our country and they are so successful in their job. For this reason, I strongly believe that if they chose their parents' job, they become successful without enduring any difficulty.
Another reason why I agree with it is that due to the competitive environment of the market, it is not logical for children to start learning new skills. Not only does it take a great deal of their time in order to become advanced in a new job, but also it is feasible that due to a huge competition they may fail. Hence, although choosing the similar job can be boring, what I am certain is that learning and starting a new job is really stressful. For example, when I was a bachelor student, I had a part-time job at university campus magazine as a reporter. As I remember, one time, I had an interview with professor Nejati, who is a well-known psychologist in my country. He told me that nowadays, there are a lot of hard metal diseases deriving from beginning new job due to the competition of the job market. He also told me that a high percentage of people choosing their parents' job are the ones having a healthy lifestyle. As a result, the more people follow their parent’s job, the more they have fun in their lives.
In conclusion, no one can deny the enormous positive effects of following our parents’ job. Not only are they able to become successful without having any difficulty, but also they are able to prevent a stressful situation from themselves deriving from choosing a various job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-12 | Mehrdad.imn | 73 | view |
- The most important things people learn are from their families? 80
- Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why?
- it is easier to family member to become successful in their lives than the past 73
- people do not refer to their families for help that the past 70
- do you agree of disagree with the following statement? It is important to know what ishappening around the world, even if it does not affect your personal lives. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, if, may, really, so, well, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2293.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 487.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70841889117 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78445330751 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466119096509 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5692718246 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.227272727 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1363636364 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.50707659623 0.236089414692 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1581323896 0.076458572812 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132033565612 0.0737576698707 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.344822726535 0.150856017488 229% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735321354381 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.