Is it better to use extra money to buy products, like clothes and electronics, or is it better to use the extra money to invest in experiences, like going on a vacation or to a concert?
When it comes to spending earned money, there is no proper way how to do it. Some people prefer using money to buy brand new clothes or electronics, while others invest it in events. In my opinion, using both practices is more beneficial than applying only one. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, many experiences provide people with useful additional information, the presence of which is essential in our lives. Humans attend exhibitions to appreciate invaluable works of famous authors or educational events to achieve more profound knowledge about their profession. Moreover, even if an experience does not require a person to educate, it still can be valuable. For example, having a vacation helps people to cope with stress and relax from the daily routine, or gives unforgettable emotions. Last year I saved money for a trip to America, and the travel exceeded all my expectations. The acquaintance with the diversity of nature and culture or lifestyle of locals amazed me, and the vacation definitely worth the invested money.
On the other hand, some people do not invest all their money in events, purchasing the last models of iPhone or expensive clothes from Gucci. Yet, such items provide a user with a rich diversity of advantages, starting from the numerous unique features to higher social status. Businessmen in expensive suits who own great real estate are more recognized by a community, than people with the same intelligence who do not stand out in society. At the same time owners of new electronics can perform usual activities faster or even better. For example, I like taking pictures of people and nature, and the presence of high tech brand new camera is vital for me.
To conclude, I strongly believe that there is no great difference between spending money on products and investing it in experiences. Both ways have their own advantages and applying these practices together simultaneously would be beneficial for everyone.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-10-27 | Ilya Kulikov | 76 | view |
- Imagine you have just been given 10 000 Would you A spend it B save it C invest it 73
- You are going to have a new roommate next semester Which of the following qualities is most important to you a cleanliness b humorous c politeness 73
- Some people like to relax when they go on vacation while others like to go sightseeing and do activities Which do you prefer and why 80
- Imagine you have just been given 10 000 Would you S W A spend it B save it C invest it 73
- You are going to have a new roommate next semester Which of the following qualities is most important to you a cleanliness b humorous c politeness 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, still, while, for example, i feel, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 333.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07807807808 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78522012502 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618618618619 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9271733452 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.4705882353 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199855744024 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577674806531 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559801655116 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113397196656 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332375772066 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, still, while, for example, i feel, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 333.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07807807808 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78522012502 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618618618619 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9271733452 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.4705882353 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199855744024 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577674806531 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559801655116 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113397196656 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332375772066 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.