Education is the backbone of human beings’ lives since it paves the road of success for individuals, and teachers play the main role in that process. In this regard, some people believe that it is tough for teachers to be widely enjoyed and have impacts on students’ learning simultaneously. I personally suppose that teachers can have both features at the same time. I will enlarge on my reasons in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, one character which has the most significant effect on teachers’ popularity is being friend with students. This quality can motivate students to talk about their problems with their teachers easily since they see their teachers as a friend, not someone who just wants to teach them some lessons. As a result, teachers would be able so effective in helping students in their lessons that no problem remains unsolved in classroom, if they were friends with their pupils. As a way of illustration, take a class in which students can explain their problems in lessons freely without any fear. Since teachers have more knowledge and experience than students, they can suggest a number of great solutions for students’ issues. In addition, this kind of teachers are more popular than are their counterparts who believe that being strict is a compelling attitude of teachers.
Secondly, another factor making teachers widely enjoyed is their knowledge. As students are trying to gather the best information, teachers can be popular if they have a considerable amount of it. Furthermore, teachers who have a lot of information can help students in learning better. As a matter of fact, an example of my own experience can confirm my stand point. My classmates and I had a teacher in our high school who was an elite. Students always liked him due to his articles which have been published in different valid journals. He always could help students to find the best method of thinking because he had collected a lot of data in distinctive fields of study. Consequently, teachers can be popular as well as they can be effective in students’ learning, if they accumulate information, which is the simplest work of every teacher.
To sum up, all things considered, not only can teachers be widely enjoyed, but also they can be effective in students’ lessons. Given the fact that, teachers should do some works which are not challenging at all. In other words, they should be students’ friends, and they should collect a great deal of data.
- TPO 56 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It was easier to achieve success in the past than it is today 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phones online games and social networking Web sites 80
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parent s jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parent s job 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than parents were in the past 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...formation can help students in learning better. As a matter of fact, an example of my ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, kind of, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00481927711 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81389043629 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5037195632 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9047619048 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7619047619 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.09523809524 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328412952831 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104944032098 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689014985232 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208168919254 0.150856017488 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040803566588 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.