Nowadays, with the education spread across the youngsters, more and more students are looking forward to high quality of education. Therefore, more and more people take teacher as a job. And parents now always want to find a popular and effective teacher for their children. However, I think that it is hard for them to find a teacher like that.
First and foremost, there is no denying that teachers who are popular will have less time because they have too many students to teach. What may explain this is that one of properties of famous teacher is that they have many students and they always teach many students in one class. This makes that the teachers have less time to treat every student, and they cannot pay attention to all students. Therefore, students' questions may not answer in time and students' attention may be distracted, which makes popular teachers cannot be effective. To illustrate this, I would like to give the example of my own experience. Once I joined a class which is taught by a famous teacher, there were nearly a hundred of students in his class, and I was sit at the last row of the class. During the class, the teacher could only focus on the first a few rows of students, and sometimes when I raised my hand to ask question, the teacher may not see it. I felt sleepy at the end of the class, and I think this kind of class was useless.
In addition, on no account should we underestimate that some effective teachers may not be popular due to their characteristics. The reason is that the teachers may be strict to make the class effective. The teachers may have a high standard of requirement to treat their students, and many students may not get well with it, which makes effective teachers are not popular. For instance, my cousin was joining in a class and the teacher was extremely strict, he ordered his students so not make mistakes. Although the time during the class was difficult, mu cousin improve a lot. He found that there were less students in his class compared with the beginning.
On contrary, though some teachers may have their special ways to teach their students and make it efficiency, I still want to say that this kind of teacher is few and they may only good at a few topics, and most of teachers cannot be both effective and popular.
In conclusion, from the reasons that demonstrate above, we can clearly see that it is hard for a teacher to be both popular and effective
- It is difficult for teachers to be both popular well liked and effective in helping students learn Agree or disagree 73
- In some countries there are more young people choosing to enroll in work based training instead of attending university Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 67
- In some countries there are more young people choosing to enroll in work based training instead of attending university Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 67
- In some countries there are more young people choosing to enroll in work based training instead of attending university Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Playing sports teach people more lessons about life 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 743, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sat'.
Suggestion: sat
...red of students in his class, and I was sit at the last row of the class. During th...
^^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun students is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...improve a lot. He found that there were less students in his class compared with the...
^^^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the teachers') or simply say ''most teachers''.
Suggestion: most of the teachers; most teachers
...they may only good at a few topics, and most of teachers cannot be both effective and popular. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59862385321 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51714410291 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422018348624 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4262321927 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304242636528 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107784224256 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693232275941 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205380362047 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322502060742 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.