It has been said, “Not everything that is learned is contained in books.”
Compare and contrast knowledge gained from experience with knowledge gained from books. In your opinion, which source is more important? Why?
It is very sensitive and controversial issue that the knowledge is gathered from book source is more important than the knowledge from experience. I believe that knowledge gained from work is more important and essential than the book source. I support this because of 3 reasons: experience in any subject helps to predict future obstacles, experience is not available in book and more readily can solve a problem.
First and foremost, earning practical knowledge is very essential because that helps to predict possible problems in a system. So that one can take possible steps to prevent that problem and can avoid chances of danger. For instance, in my industry one experienced but uneducated labor does the process rejection loss 40 percentage less in comparison to an unexperienced and undergraduate supervisor. Therefore, knowledge gain from experience is more important than book source.
Secondly, the skill and techniques require for working in an industry is not always available in books or reading materials and even can't be learned without doing work practically in the field. That is because during working on a subject, one can learn and gets training in each step of the process. Therefore, gaining practical knowledge is very essential than bookish knowledge.
Finally, the practical knowledge is inevitable to avoid accident involve in work. It is not always possible to get all the necessary information from reading source, because that need hands on experience. As a result, to reduces the possibility of accident it is cardinal to have the practical training.
In conclusion, I strongly agree that the knowledge earned from experience is indispensable than having a pedantic knowledge. I buttress that with three supporting points that the professional experience helps to extrapolate the future hindrance, it does not present in the study material and one can avoid an accident.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | M.A.Arefee | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | mukesh7541 | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | S_Daftari | 76 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | kian22 | 60 | view |
| 2019-06-30 | tjehdaud12 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:“It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city. 73
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in thepresent. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons andexamples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
- It is better for people to move out of their hometowns when they become adults, instead of staying in their home communities for their whole lives.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... in books or reading materials and even cant be learned without doing work practical...
^^^^
Line 9, column 104, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'pedantic knowledge'.
Suggestion: pedantic knowledge
...experience is indispensable than having a pedantic knowledge. I buttress that with three supporting ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 301.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35880398671 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98605863556 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 212.727598566 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504983388704 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1826938979 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.533333333 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21961710456 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931631926565 0.076458572812 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101461729482 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130909901277 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760112000804 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.