It is important for everyone to know about what happening all around the world even though the events have not affect our daily life.
The importance of getting about daily news has become the topic of great controversy in recent years. There is a considerable body of opinion that it is important for everyone to know about what happening all around the world even though the events have not affect our daily life. This paper will elucidate the reasons why I am in favor of this opinion.
On one hand, good relationship management and failure avoidance are what I consider crucial factors. It is noteworthy that knowing about events that not really affect people life is synonymous with obtaining multifarious information from social media. Thanks to this, they are likely to build up solid foundation of knowledge in many categories such as science, economy, and business. Accordingly, they are capable of finding some interesting details to communicate with their acquaintance. With this in mind, they stand a golden chance to get more appreciation from their acquaintance and chance to cultivate circles of truly supportive friendships simultaneously. Eventually, this probably gives rise to good relationship management. More notably, while people are getting daily news that not really affect to people life such as criminals, scandals, and suicides etc., learning from another people's mortifying failures is inevitable. In the event of this, there is a likelihood for them to internalize self-discipline and responsibility. On the ground of that, it is also conceivable to accumulate over the years preparing them to take on greater and more meaningful challenges. During this process, demonstrating the practical sagacity while they get enmeshed in difficulties seems to be on the cards. Under those circumstances, it makes it feasible for them to avert the unintended consequences by denying the daily news. Given these points, getting daily news greatly contributes to failure avoidance.
On the other hand, some people express a different view that getting daily news that completely not associated with their daily life discourages them from practicing frugality in the expenditure of time. As a consequence, it creates a huge burden on career success. Although that might be true, it is just applicable to a minority. They have already well thought about the plan. Incidentally, there is the apparent purposefulness of their method. Therefore, it is unlikely that getting information on the daily basis prevents their intention to achieve satisfactory results in their career. Another point often overlooked is that even if waste of time does exist, it should be considered as the chance for them to obtain an relaxing moment. By the same token, they have an incentive to inspire and motivate themselves to make a strenuous efforts for their job. They are given the opportunity to get satisfaction out of realizing themselves develop and reach some of their goals and abilities, which creates a significant impact on the current state of affairs. Beyond any doubt, they have a propensity to relieve tension and promote circulation to make the brain more active. Thus, indeed, empowers them to ameliorate their physical and intellectual ability. Thus, indeed, empowers them to have a bright future in their career. By and large, people should put off the idea that getting news that are not affected to their daily life precludes them from achieving something meaningful in their career.
In summary, failure avoidance and good relationship management are the convincing reasons for my approval. I hope that people take this writing into great consideration to gather diverse perspectives issue regarding the importance of getting about daily news.
- It is important for everyone to know about what happening all around the world even though the events have not affect our daily life 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents should set strict rules to their children if they want them to succeed in the future 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'affected'.
Suggestion: affected
...e world even though the events have not affect our daily life. This paper will elucida...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 638, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r point often overlooked is that even if waste of time does exist, it should be c...
^^
Line 3, column 723, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...idered as the chance for them to obtain an relaxing moment. By the same token, the...
^^
Line 3, column 840, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effort'?
Suggestion: effort
...motivate themselves to make a strenuous efforts for their job. They are given the oppor...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, incidentally, look, really, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in summary, such as, by and large, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 52.1666666667 167% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3057.0 1977.66487455 155% => OK
No of words: 572.0 407.700716846 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34440559441 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89045207381 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99744122462 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 296.0 212.727598566 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517482517483 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 976.5 618.680645161 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4862525581 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.9 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 11.8709677419 194% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270642879487 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695476367418 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15459621884 0.0737576698707 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221213681978 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.199362290179 0.0645574589148 309% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 162.0 86.8835125448 186% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.