It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Nowadays, methods of working have gotten important for companies. Regard this fact, there is a controversial question expressing whether companies should emphasize long hours with short days for employees or short hours with long days. I agree with the opinion which is choosing more days and fewer hours. The reasons to substantiate my idea are explored in the following.
First, concentrating on a job is the foremost indicator for every company in the way of improving. To put on the other hand, employees who have enough time to feel free also adequate time to think about the problems of projects have better performance than people who have to finish their work in less time and three days. As an illustration, I am going to speak about my friend who used to work for two companies coincide. Once upon a time, while he was preparing one of the most important projects of the company, his boss told him that you are not concentrating on our project and you have to quit the company. My friend had lost his job because he worked there three days with ten hours for each day, as a result, he could not manage all the problems for both companies.
Second, an employee who is tired every day cannot promote a company that has a lot of wishes. Surely, working for ten hours a day will decrease the performance of a person who tries to solve the problems of a project. Under such a circumstance, everyone faces difficulties and this event makes harmful vibe for a company. As an illustration, I have been leading the developers of a Tosan company since I joined there, at the beginning, we had to work 2 days and for each day we had to spend 10 hours on projects, as a result, at the end of the day, everyone felt tired and they could not help each other to find the solutions; therefore, we changed the hours of working from 2 days to 4 days and instead of 10 hours we chose 7 hours a day. After the decision, all the employees of Tosan strongly felt better. If we had not changed the hours of work, our employees in Tosan would not work better.
By and large, I do believe long days with short hours, is a better choice for companies that try to promote their level. Since the people of a company have enough time to concentrate on the projects which need careful attention. Also, the employees would not feel tired during performing projects which compel them bored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 81
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education. 54
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 70
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 70
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...panies that try to promote their level. Since the people of a company have enough tim...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, therefore, while, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54906542056 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56807482322 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476635514019 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.9493218887 48.9658058833 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.166666667 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349087284298 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105348247755 0.076458572812 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710130279704 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211902079897 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662547283261 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.