Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer.
Work is the crucial part of everyone’s life. All of us have some or the other responsibilities to accomplish. Some people think that the ability to work independently is more important than working with a group as a team; however, others believe it vice versa. Personally, I support the idea that one should be able to work with a group of people as a team, for the following reasons.
First of all, the working in a team help you improve your performance and work more efficiently. For instance, a physician seeing a patient. When a patient consults a clinic, he is first, seen by a receptionist; does the paperwork; later visited by a physician assistant for assessing vitals and basic history. This is followed by a physician who checks the complain; makes a diagnosis and forms a treatment plan for the patient. The nurse takes care of the medicine timings and the dosage given to the patient regularly. These all people work as a team to enhance the patient's experience of the health services. Conversely, it is not possible for the doctor to perform all these duties alone, as he has to check on number of patients. Such a situation will result in poor patient outcome as the physician can’t focus on the task in which he is trained and good at. This explains how team work can enhance the efficiency of each of its member.
Moreover, ability to work in a team helps you to finish multiple necessary tasks within the given time. Although if you know how to work independently, it is not possible every time to execute different tasks in time. Doing house chores is a perfect example for this. I and my husband commute to the office daily for work. In addition, we have many household chores in "to do " list of the day. For example, cooking meals, breakfast, doing dishes, spending time with the kids, house cleaning, and washing clothes. Even though I can do all of this without anybody’s help, yet I need to work with my husband and kids so that we all manage together to finish the work in time and spend some family hour. This is only possible if we distribute our responsibilities and work as a team.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that one should have the ability to work in a team. This is because it promotes efficient execution of work and because group work helps you to complete multiple necessary tasks within the time.
- You are a boss working at a large company, and you need to hire a new worker. What are the advantages and disadvantages of hiring an older (40 years old+) or a younger worker (25 years+)? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- You are a boss working at a large company, and you need to hire a new worker. What are the advantages and disadvantages of hiring an older (40 years old+) or a younger worker (25 years+)? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decades, a met 73
- In some countries, teenagers have jobs while they are still students. Do you think this is a good idea? Support your opinion by using specific reasons and details. 73
- Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'vices'?
Suggestion: vices
...p as a team; however, others believe it vice versa. Personally, I support the idea t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s is followed by a physician who checks the complain; makes a diagnosis and forms a treatmen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, so, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, you know, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67303102625 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76959899039 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503579952267 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3413185842 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1304347826 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2173913043 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86956521739 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313581922295 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972138734225 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10884376019 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223138743344 0.150856017488 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121141080986 0.0645574589148 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.