Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer.
The work style plays a critically important role in achieving the best possible outcomes. Some people incline to work independently, while others adhere to the teamwork approach instead. In my opinion, I reckon that teamwork style is more beneficial. I feel that way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First, it is effective and efficient, which means that we can come up with a better and achievable plan more rapidly than working alone. For instance, my company, Novartis Pharma, faced a dramatic reduction in sales volume in the first quarter of the last year. Although the hard work of each member of my team had done for almost two weeks, we hardly accomplished any progress in reaching a solution. Thus, our GM had held a meeting in the main office, whereby we had an opportunity to share our perspectives; we had, then, a panoramic picture of the crisis from all angles. Someone had suggested an idea, and someone else built on it, and so on. Ultimately, we wrapped up our collective thoughts in a logical well-articulated strategy with an action pane, which enabled us to increase our sales tremendously by the end of the year. This experience taught me that if it had not for teamwork, we would have never been able to defeat the crisis as fast.
Secondly, another remarkably potential benefit for teamwork setting is the higher likelihood to expand our experience. For instance, my very diversified team was a strong point in building my career because I gained a lot of knowledge from my teammates. After I had joined the company, I learned different things from those various characters. I still recall my senior teammate, who had eight years of experience, had taught me every detail and secret in sales. Moreover, I was responsible for training the newly-hired fresh graduate, which gave me a golden chance to refresh my academic knowledge. As you can see, teammates do guide and help you to acquire a superb experience.
In conclusion, working in a team is a privilege. Not only because we get our work tasks done through thinking approaches and plans efficiently, but also we improve our career's experience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-01 | dr.samiaelwakil | 80 | view |
| 2020-07-05 | rabindra | 60 | view |
| 2019-06-01 | Riddhi Jain | 85 | view |
| 2017-09-27 | forush | 55 | view |
| 2016-04-27 | Samar 1984 | 73 | view |
- Robert E Peary was a well known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole When he returned from the expedition he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7 1909 This report made him into an international celebrity Though 95
- Robert E Peary was a well known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole When he returned from the expedition he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7 1909 This report made him into an international celebrity Though 90
- TPO 27 Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage 80
- Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 80
- Movies and television strongly influence the way people behave Do you agree or disagree Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The work style plays a critically import...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will explore in the following essay. First, it is effective and efficient,...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... you to acquire a superb experience. In conclusion, working in a team is a pr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, well, while, for instance, i feel, i reckon, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 365.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93150684932 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87378063268 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613698630137 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6428109483 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7368421053 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2105263158 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.68421052632 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111757580114 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428652466999 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579373864913 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084784921633 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486699120049 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.