Is it more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team or to work independently? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer.
Having a worthwhile job plays such an important role that a person success is heavily based on. Depending upon personal experiences, personality traits, and concerns we find that people have a divers approach to choose different works. Although some people hold the opinion that work independently because of quiet and alone, I would rather to join a group for doing a job owing to enhancing knowledge and improving social skills.
First and foremost, obtaining a vast range of new knowledge and experience merely is a significant merit of working in a group. It is crystal-clear that working in team provides an opportunity to use people’s experiences, so you become persuade to learn new things which can contribute to enhance the rate of your literacy. In addition, an expression is prevalent between people “two heads are always better than ones” that present with cooperating works are done better than lonely. Moreover, when you cooperate with other people to do works, you can economize your time. As a matter of fact, you can divide works between other your colleagues and allocate your time for a special section of work, therefore you have concentrate entirely in the best way, and solve problems easily. In addition, two heads are always better than ones. As result, working in a group can help people to be both learned and knowledge individuals.
In addition, acquiring social skills can be considered another advantage of working in a team. It goes without saying that people who work in a group have better communication skill in comparison individuals that work lonely. In fact, a person can work in a team can be familiar with new peoples and make friendship with them. Moreover, he learns how to socialize with other people and it can be useful for other aspect of his life. For example, in a team you learn how to accept the conflicting opinions that are presented by your teammate without any enmity. As a consequence, improving communication skills is another remarkable merit of working in a group.
In a nutshell, according to the above-mentioned points and details, working in a team has several advantages that people cannot acquire them lonely. How can you enhancing your knowledge without cooperating with your teammate? Can you save your time and solve problems without helping your co-workers? do you improve your social skills lonely? I absolutely believe no!
- Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient. Other people say that computers have made life more complex and stressful. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Universities should spend more money in buying facilities than hiring famous professors. 70
- People work because they need money to live. What are some other reasons that people work? 70
- Young people should try many different kinds of jobs or career before they decide the long term career of their life 78
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'divers'' or 'diver's'?
Suggestion: divers'; diver's
...and concerns we find that people have a divers approach to choose different works. Alt...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 302, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Do
...oblems without helping your co-workers? do you improve your social skills lonely? ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'as a matter of fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225950782998 0.229887763892 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.17225950783 0.158761421928 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0738255033557 0.0866891130778 85% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0447427293065 0.046263068375 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0648769574944 0.0685040099705 95% => OK
Prepositions: 0.131991051454 0.118717715034 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0559284116331 0.0351676179071 159% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87080793768 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0246085011186 0.0309702414327 79% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.076062639821 0.0887237588012 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0268456375839 0.0209618222197 128% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0201342281879 0.0139019557991 145% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2407.0 2387.08602151 101% => OK
No of words: 395.0 408.028673835 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.09367088608 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.4 0.338922669872 118% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291139240506 0.251872472559 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.194936708861 0.174417080927 112% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.156962025316 0.112833075102 139% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87080793768 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506329113924 0.524397521467 97% => OK
Word variations: 55.4610643778 59.2087087015 94% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.8095238095 20.5533526081 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.168920737 48.84282405 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.619047619 120.699889404 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8095238095 20.5533526081 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52380952381 0.644075263715 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 47.9234478602 45.7405998639 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.46825396825 1.45489161554 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342051556966 0.300154397459 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.110596564905 0.103427244359 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0875269377746 0.0752933317313 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.454723371767 0.497263757937 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.110010209076 0.151897553556 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115287959426 0.114077575197 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801026967544 0.0781384742642 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.350726015849 0.336927656856 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0996193816902 0.067059652881 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238990804804 0.210909579961 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564854615786 0.0618886996521 91% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8870967742 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 15.0 8.42114695341 178% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.