It is more important for the government to spend money to improve internet access than to improve public transportation.
It is claimed that spending money by the government to develop the availability of the internet is more significant than rising the quality of public transportation. I, for one, subscribe to that view suggesting authorities to allocate budget on the internet rather than public vehicles. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on several reasons to support my idea.
Firstly, taking advantage of the internet by people has increased in time more than public transportation. Indeed, no one can ignore that the internet dominates the world nowadays. In fact, in many aspects of life, the trace of the internet has appeared . So, the government had better spend money to reflect people’s demand to have satisfying well-being among them. Consider me as an example. I prefer, instead of taking a bus and go shopping, to stay at home and just by clicking do any online shopping. Counsecounsly, people’s attitude has indicated that the use of the internet is more than taking public communication.
Secondly, funding elevating accessibility of the internet is recommended because the government should spend money on the aspects that are more beneficial for all. Few presents of the population enjoy public transportation comparing with some of them who require the internet daily.
A recent study has shown that selling private cars during the few decays indicated that people tend to use public transportation less than before. On the other side, according to other statistical evidence, purchasing many internet services illustrates that people consume the internet highly more than in the past.
In conclusion, I agree with that topic . The governments should allocate their funds to improve people’s accessibility of the internet than their availability of public transportation. Since, it is significant rarely to rule out people’s attendances who are always taking advantage of the internet. Besides, the merits of the internet outweigh the gains of taking public transportation for whole people, according to some researches.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 253, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
..., the trace of the internet has appeared . So, the government had better spend mo...
^^
Line 2, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...appeared . So, the government had better spend money to reflect people’s demand t...
^^
Line 2, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e’s demand to have satisfying well-being among them. Consider me as an example. I...
^^
Line 2, column 540, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opping. Counsecounsly, people’s attitude has indicated that the use of the intern...
^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re more beneficial for all. Few presents of the population enjoy public transport...
^^
Line 4, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... internet highly more than in the past. In conclusion, I agree with that topic ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In conclusion, I agree with that topic . The government...
^^
Line 6, column 40, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... In conclusion, I agree with that topic . The governments should allocate their f...
^^
Line 6, column 187, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... availability of public transportation. Since, it is significant rarely to rule out p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46056782334 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13529776552 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533123028391 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2290283676 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1666666667 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38888888889 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.440726139898 0.236089414692 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123106060174 0.076458572812 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103197969982 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248526933452 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555008270909 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.