Some people believe that it is very essential to have a wide network of friends. This in turn gives them wider alternatives when in need of any help or rather for any means of company. However, even though it is very important to not restrict ourselves with limited people,I believe that it is also very essential to maintain friendship with our older friends. I feel this way for several reasons and the coming two paragraphs will justify my viewpoints.
Firstly, our older friends know us better and have more experience with us than our newly formed friends. When in need of anything, they can have a thorough understanding of all the aspects which may otherwise not be familar to someone else. To state an instance, since I had trouble coping up with maths in my college, my friend from high school could help me with it better since she is already familar with my aversion towards maths. She could help me understand it faster because she already knows my strengths and weakness with the subject. On the other hand, if I had asked for help from one of my college friend, it would have taken up a longer amount of time for her to figure out my grasping of the subject. Hence, I believe that our older friends have a better understanding of us as a person than our newly formed friends.
Secondly, I feel that it is easier for us to communicate openly without any hesitation with our older friends. This is mainly because of the amount of time we have shared together. After spending a considerable amount of time being friends, we tend to understand the opinions and beliefs of each other and likewise the shyness and hesitation to express our thoughts are eliminated. For example, any teenager facing a personal problem is likely to talk about it with his/her older friends rather than a new friend with the hesitation of them turning out to be judgemental. Even if the teenager may discuss the issue with his/her new friends, it is highly possible that it may just be a superficial communication and not complete expression of thoughts and emotions. Therefore, it is comparatively a much easier task to express ourselves in a better and effective way to someone we have known for a longer time than to someone new to us.
This topic, however, is a complex one and is difficult to pick sides completely. Nevertheless, it is only our comfort with the other person that in the end ultimately defines our friendship and hence, I believe that our older friends are someone who can definitely provide us with it. Therefore. I contend that it is more important to maintain friendship with our old friends than keep making new friends.
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enoug 79
- TPO-18: students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends 73
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends. 70
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situations do you think is better? 90
- Shrimping industry rely on trawls to catch the shrimps. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...t restrict ourselves with limited people,I believe that it is also very essential ...
^^
Line 8, column 286, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... who can definitely provide us with it. Therefore. I contend that it is more important to...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, likewise, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i feel, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 76.0 43.0788530466 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72510822511 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66530032601 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448051948052 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 681.3 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2837774331 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.894736842 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3157894737 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47368421053 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205072410377 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784287378402 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137715484624 0.0737576698707 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138668672109 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077818530888 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.