It is more important to read and watch news presented by people whose opinion is different from your own view than by people whose opinion are similar to yours.
At the turn of the new century, with the development of human’s modern society and galloping rate of science and technology, more and more people tend to keep abreast of daily events. Actually, there are unlimited ways to get aware of news such as the internet, radio, and television. Although some people adhere to this belief that it is better watching news presented by people with similar perspective, I would prefer being exposed to the news with distinctive viewpoints since it broadens knowledge and develops critical thinking skill.
The first aspect to point out is that what provokes people to be exposed news with a distinctive opinion is expanding their horizon. In fact, one of the rigors of modern hectic life is that people need to acquire a vast range of proper information to make rational and immediate decisions for having promising future, so without shadow of doubt they should listen or watch the news which is opposite to their perspective. Not only does distinctive news open a new window to people’s mind, but also it inspires them to assess the accuracy of their beliefs. Take a case of a person who has positive opinions about one of the president candidates and make the decision to vote him for instance. Actually, hearing negative opinions about his favorite candidate motivates him to gain more information about him from trustworthy sources and analyze them in order to make the best choice.
A further more subtle point is that improving critical thinking skills is another remarkable benefit of hearing news which is completely different with our perspectives. As a matter of fact, people’s attitudes toward lifestyle, societies’ rules and so forth are significantly different from person to person; therefore if they cannot listen to opposite beliefs patiently, they will run into a huge problem and have trouble in socializing with other people easily. To illustrate more, consider a person who cannot tolerate distinctive opinions. This person neither can convey his valuable information nor get persuaded by other people with different ideas. Hardly does he spend time and share ideas; so he little by little can fortify his critical thinking by being imposed opposite news. He allocates his time to a person with a different idea to elaborate his ideas and then think about them preciously. Finally, he feels satisfied with his behavior
On the whole, according to the above-mentioned points and details, it is crystal-clear (obvious) that a person can expand his knowledge and strengthen his critical thinking by being exposed opposite news and beliefs. It is high time we stopped overlooking the fact that a person who has stubborn personality can make progress in his life. In fact, how people who suffer lack of patience can expand their knowledge and fortify their critical thinking? Undoubtedly, answer of this question is being exposed news with distinctive perspective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-22 | paris.alaei@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | HSNDEK | 76 | view |
| 2019-04-22 | paris.alaei@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
| 2018-09-17 | zabanfinish | 77 | view |
- People work because they need money to live. What are some other reasons that people work? Discuss one or more of these reasons. Use specific examples and details to support your answer. 76
- integrated 46 73
- Do you agree or disagree? People gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life. 76
- Do you agree or disagree? People gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life. 76
- Do you agree or disagree,With the help of technology, students nowadays can learn more information and learn it more quickly? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., he feels satisfied with his behavior On the whole, according to the above-men...
^^
Line 4, column 541, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...osed news with distinctive perspective.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'for instance', 'in fact', 'such as', 'as a matter of fact', 'on the whole']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235849056604 0.229887763892 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.160377358491 0.158761421928 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.103773584906 0.0866891130778 120% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0471698113208 0.046263068375 102% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0660377358491 0.0685040099705 96% => OK
Prepositions: 0.11320754717 0.118717715034 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0433962264151 0.0351676179071 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84911061971 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0377358490566 0.0309702414327 122% => OK
Particles: 0.00188679245283 0.00188951952338 100% => OK
Determiners: 0.0622641509434 0.0887237588012 70% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0188679245283 0.0209618222197 90% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0150943396226 0.0139019557991 109% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2941.0 2387.08602151 123% => OK
No of words: 474.0 408.028673835 116% => OK
Chars per words: 6.20464135021 5.86048508987 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48200974243 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.405063291139 0.338922669872 120% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.295358649789 0.251872472559 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.227848101266 0.174417080927 131% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.14135021097 0.112833075102 125% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84911061971 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518987341772 0.524397521467 99% => OK
Word variations: 60.9062120073 59.2087087015 103% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6684587814 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.3333333333 20.5533526081 128% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2550816631 48.84282405 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.388888889 120.699889404 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.5533526081 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.644075263715 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 55.8691983122 45.7405998639 122% => OK
Elegance: 1.43448275862 1.45489161554 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315492157749 0.300154397459 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.13691622198 0.103427244359 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.071565336021 0.0752933317313 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.498921547513 0.497263757937 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.130907695729 0.151897553556 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124076424949 0.114077575197 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615765060111 0.0781384742642 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.378529032273 0.336927656856 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0707669720367 0.067059652881 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221056048861 0.210909579961 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381407876849 0.0618886996521 62% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.4623655914 244% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.