It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own.
Undoubtedly, it is of great importance for people to be aware of different occurences that are happenning around the world. It is now possible with a variety of news outlets that are provided for everybody. Although some may insist on watching news from sources which think similar to them, I personally believe that it would be an asset to follow news using different aspects and points of view. I feel this way for a couple of main reasons that I will elaborate in the following essay.
To begin with, by listening to the people with different views individuals may change their idea about a certain topic that they used to think about in a fallacious way. In fact, when people are inclined to a certain point of view it is may be affected by sources that try to tell news based on their own benefits. Thus, people who only listen to this group, will be mistakenly one of their supporters. For instance, people in the North korea are only provided with news that are advantageous for their government. Some years ago, the news in North korea told their people that they were the football world cup champions, which was a ridiculous news as they even could not qualify for the next round. So, they would be better to try to receive news from a source rather than their national television and government, because had they have access to additional sources, they would have been aware of the real result of their national neam.
Moreover, when people follow news from different sources it is an asset for them while making important desicions. To be more specific, the majority of news outlets are inclined to a certain political party. Thus, while presidential election they only try to talk about their own group, and even destroy the people's considerations about the opponent party. As a result, people who do not limit themselves to read about a particular political group, are more prone to make a correct vote to the more deserved candidate. On the other hand, the voters who only follow the news from a certain channel, which champions a particular candidate, are more likely to make a wrong desicion, which can give rise to a bad future for themselves and their children. Thus, people are better to find news from different attitudes.
To sum up, I am completely convinced that it is more advantageous for people to follow news from various sources, not only because they can change their wrong ideas about different things but also because they may prevent from taking bad desicions for themselves and their country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-17 | Mitra-T | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | redark777 | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | janfaisal | 73 | view |
- It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or country because they lose their old friends 70
- Brendan the Navigator was an Irish priest who lived in the 6th century He is most famous for embarking on a voyage in search of the mythical Island of the Blessed The details of Brendan s voyage recorded as stories in old manuscripts suggest to some that 3
- Would you prefer to take courses taught by professors with whom you have already had other classes during your past years of study or would you prefer to take courses with professors whose classes you have never taken before Why 81
- It is commonly believed that in life success is not the most important thing it is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail Do you agree with that idea 71
- Palm oil a liquid produced by palm trees and used for cooking and other purposes has become very popular in recent years As a result the palm oil industry has had a dramatic impact on the economies and landscapes of countries in which it operates When ask 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a fallacious way" with adverb for "fallacious"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ain topic that they used to think about in a fallacious way. In fact, when people are inclined to a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 633, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'ridiculous news'.
Suggestion: ridiculous news
...football world cup champions, which was a ridiculous news as they even could not qualify for the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, i feel, in fact, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2104.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81464530892 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54415113427 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45766590389 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0451387301 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.764705882 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7058823529 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222318633755 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864569916509 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512800918363 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147331101558 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039181345162 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a fallacious way" with adverb for "fallacious"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ain topic that they used to think about in a fallacious way. In fact, when people are inclined to a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 633, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'ridiculous news'.
Suggestion: ridiculous news
...football world cup champions, which was a ridiculous news as they even could not qualify for the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, i feel, in fact, as a result, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2104.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81464530892 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54415113427 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45766590389 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0451387301 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.764705882 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7058823529 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222318633755 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864569916509 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512800918363 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147331101558 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039181345162 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.