In today’s complicated and interconnected world we live in, comprehension plays a vital role in the development and progress of the societies and countries. Some people believe that students should learn as much fact as they can in schools and universities. I personally, on the other hand, think that pupils should allocate more time to understand the concepts and notions they learn in the class. I feel this way due to two significant reasons which I will explain in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, if students learn the logic behind lessons they learn, they can easily apply it in their personal and later in their occupational life. In this line of thought, they can benefit from what they learn in the future. Nevertheless, they just memorize some information which is not useful for them in the long run. My personal example is a good illustration of this notion. Three years ago, when I was studying in university, I learned how to do statistical analysis in structural engineering. As a result, I applied whatever I learnt in my occupation which resulted in my rapid promotion after being employed. Had I not understood the rationale behind the theoretic aspects of that subject, I would not have been able to take advantage of it in my job position. Therefore, this example demonstrates how it is important for students to fully absorb the concepts instead of memorizing some basic information.
Last but not least, by learning the reasons behind the knowledge pupils learn from their teachers, they can make the world a better place to live through helping other individuals in their life. Aiding others when they face a problem or dilemma by them in the future can contribute a lot to the world where they live. For instance, my cousin used to learn how the electronic devices work. Consequently, after her graduation from school, she was able to repair every defect made in electronic equipment in the home. Hence, we took advantage of an expert when needed for some repairs required for damages made in some apparatus. If she had not grasped the ideas fully, she could not have helped us in the household repair and maintenance issues occurred once in a while for us. So, it is crucial for pupils to understand the concepts, not just learn some facts.
To put it all in a nutshell, taking all the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I am of opinion that students have to know the rationale behind concepts educators give them. Not only can they make use of them in the near future in their lives, but also they can solve other people’s problems when needed.
- Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 73
- Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 70
- driverless cars 75
- Toward the end of his life the Chevalier de Seingalt 1725 1798 wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure but since he met many famous people including kings and writers his memoir has become a
- TPO 39 Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 862, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he concepts, not just learn some facts. To put it all in a nutshell, taking all ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, i feel, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2171.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87865168539 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77695532438 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530337078652 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5981604152 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.380952381 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1904761905 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2380952381 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266647768942 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760818835272 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692274974846 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14949414115 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439809604168 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.