It is a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration.
It is a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration.
Since the dawn of civilization and industrialization, the radical and crucial role of government to explore and open the new opportunity in the people’s lives is undeniable. Whether the government should allocate budget to the space exploration programs is depends on the lens through which aspect of space exploration is looking. This question has long tantalized best thinkers all over the world. As the matter of fact, space has the radical and crucial impact on the future of the next generation. From my vantage point, the impact of the role of space is undeniable. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the outstanding standpoints to support my viewpoint.
The main reason for lending credence to the argument is that nowadays, government access to the budget allocation so they must consider the space exploration as one of the important issues which lead the new generation of space research. For instance, if the hazard threats the human in the future, not only the human but also the earth would be able to survive. As the matter of fact, the space station can estimate and assess new meteorite whenever it wants to hit the earth and destroy it or change its pathway. The space research is mandatory for the human who lives on the earth. Nor one should regret the importance of that issue to the earth. The noteworthy intelligible research conducted by the NASA reveals that not only should the government allocate more money than before for space exploration but also they should encourage more people to perpetually pay heed to the space issue.
The other subtle reason to be mentioned is that the new aspects of other interdisciplinary majors are related to space. To approach to this issue, the modern world offers numerous example of this issue, for instance, some cancer can treat in the space condition. Although, the cost of this research is too much and the private corporation may not be able to support these research materials, on this circumstances should the government pay heed to this aspect of knowledgeable, to reach to the pinnacle of the goals. The space travel at first, conducted by the government but after five decades the private company leads this profitable business. After a while, the big corporation would be interested in the novel space technologies and it creates thousands of job opportunities for every nation. To illustrate the impact of space exploration, take the subtle evidence as an example, the satellites are revolutionized people’s lives which at first US governments were dubious about the influence of these technologies. Todays, the satellite plays the key role effect on every country in political and sociable issue.
To wrap it all, beliefs at odds with what I alluded to might be tossed around about that the government should spend the budget to space programs or not. I personally reckon that in this modern world and trend away from traditional toward the modernization the government should give attention to space matters much more than before. As the matter of fact, there are some other reasons and examples to illustrate my perspective, but let’s suffice to this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | mheydarido07 | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | MIDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | MIDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | cathylin36 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | zari1991 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 179, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the people's lives is undeniable. Whether the government should allocate budget t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 359, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'tantalized the best'.
Suggestion: tantalized the best
...tion is looking. This question has long tantalized best thinkers all over the world. As the mat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 395, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...to support these research materials, on this circumstances should the government pay...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 34.0 8.0752688172 421% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2712.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 537.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05027932961 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90714839289 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469273743017 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 848.7 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 13.0 3.08781362007 421% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7930278742 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.913043478 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.347826087 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4347826087 5.45110844103 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431889360492 0.236089414692 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138480299582 0.076458572812 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.198252378536 0.0737576698707 269% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.363228470058 0.150856017488 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.32179463483 0.0645574589148 498% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.