It is a waste of money for the government to spend money on space travel or space exploration.

Currently, many countries start to unfold their space exploration plan. Many states have managed to send their astronauts into space successfully such as China, Russia, USA and so on. Does it necessary? Since we have not found evident benefit of space research to human welfare, many people start to suspect that a myriad of dollars invested into space researching is a huge waste. However, as far as I am concerned, it is worthy.

First and foremost, space exploration has much of researching fruit already. It is just you are not familiar whit them. Space research concern astrology, biology, physics, and many other disciplines. And all disciplines have great outcome through space exploration. For example, astronomers learn a lot of attributes of the other stars in our galaxy, through which they can derive the origin of our universe. For physics, they find many bizarre particles from the universal ray, which verified the prediction of positive electron or magnetic monopole and so on. Recently, the observation of gravitational wave validates the justification of the relative furtherly. But the most remarkable outcome relating to our daily life is the space vegetable. Scientists send the seed of a variety of vegetables or other plants to the space. And plant the seeds after they came back. They found the vegetable growing from these seeds gain better properties such as more nutrient, tastier or more productive. Now, these kinds of vegetables are propagated into the market, and we all benefit from it. How can someone assert that space exploration is worthless?

Second, many basic researches cannot have economical effect in the short term, but in the long run, it may bring a revolutionary change to the world. Say math, it is such basic discipline that it seems to have no contribution to our economy. However, any science such as physics chemistry cannot move on without math. And physics or chemistry can produce such a huge value to society. So, can we stop developing math? Obviously not. It is the same with other disciplines. When Maxwell concluded the famous Maxwell's equations nobody foresaw that it will become the basis of the several pillar industries hundreds of years later. So basic scientific research is fundamental and crucial.

In a nutshell, space travel or space exploration not only benefit our today's daily life but also have profound meaning in the long run. It should persist.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... It is the same with other disciplines. When Maxwell concluded the famous Maxwells e...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, well, for example, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2036.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14141414141 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77413443346 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3578036466 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.7142857143 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1428571429 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.64285714286 5.45110844103 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172970926986 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426433620127 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578264235268 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116383539933 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684947443599 0.0645574589148 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.94 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.