Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree?
The Leader is not about a title or designation. A leader is one who knows the way, goes the way, and shows the way. Young leaders can bring revolutionary change to the organization and society because of that I strongly believe that any organization should be led by the young person.
First, young leaders are the future of the organization and their leadership skill leads each and every aspect of the organization towards the success or otherwise. Not only that, but they also carry great ideas, energy, and passion. They often possess advanced thinking. Creativity is necessary for few fields such as, film industries and fashion industries. In these young leaders are more appropriate compared to the older people.
Secondly, in technological era, young leader can perform better compared to the older people because the young generation has access to internet from the very young age and that further kept them up to date with the technological advancement. Additionally, young are physically fit, so they can handle difficult situations much efficiently and can also do hard work. Being a leader requires people to work with more pressure, and older people might take a step back and give up, whereas young leader keeps searching for the solution of the problem. Today, many companies have younger CEO’s. For example, Mark Zuckerberg- Facebook’s founder and CEO. Over the years he has proven himself a much better leader compare to any other older generation because of the knowledge of technology. Recently, there was misuse of the data from Facebook. But he tackled the situation very well, he explained the problem and find a solution for it.
In conclusion, young leaders become a mirror image for the future young generation. Compare to older people, young are strong, creative and capable enough to beat the older people who have more experience because of that young should be leader of the organization.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-05 | ankitapatel | 76 | view |
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A zoo has no useful purpose. Use specific reasons and examples to explain. 70
- Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 67
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 80
- It has recently been announced that a high school in your community would refuse bad record students Do you support or oppose this plan why Use specific reasons and examples to explain your opinion 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...propriate compared to the older people. Secondly, in technological era, young le...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13968253968 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78310419033 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561904761905 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.5721769222 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9444444444 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243567278205 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768331942597 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706325834656 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161751042673 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160529660261 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.