Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
History has a tendency to be repeated many times a row, so we can compare events form past to modern occasions. It is a reason why, I feel that knowledge about previous times helps to deal with the present. Besides that, learning about past makes us more learned persons that increase our understanding of life and world.
To begin with, events of past still influence on present occasions. It would be better to say, that past has formed the present; hence, any modern event or thing contains something out of the past. This shows the intrinsic connection of past and present. For instance, this bound can be observed in traditions of nations or in current borders of countries. Both customs and nations have been formed in past and reflects the history independent of our desires not to accept this. Consequently, we are closely related with the past even if we do not notice this relation in our everyday life. This is the reason, why the present is accounted for past and present cannot be considered without past. All of that makes learning of history is essential for everyday living.
What is more, history is unlimited source of wise of preceding generations so being awared of past allows mankind to overcome modern challenges that humanity faces. In other words, everything has happened already sometimes in past, so answers to majority of issues can be found in the annals of history. By the same token, learning about past provides people an opportunity not to make again same mistakes as our anchors have done. Moreover, people who know about events of past, have more complete picture of the world and are able to make more complex decisions. This is because learned persons can take in account experience of the old outer world. As a result, this benefits of knowing history makes a contribution to the importance of knowing about past.
To summarize, events that has already happen reflects our everyday reality, so we cannot reject them. This the reason why history saves its meaning and should be studied by everyone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | Pandalove | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Majid1369708090 | 76 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | swapnil.paliwal | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | S_Daftari | 80 | view |
| 2019-04-24 | Shazli | 83 | view |
- four day work week 80
- People most respect the powerful not when they exercise their power, but when they refrain from exercising it. 50
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- What famous place would you like to visit? Use details and reasons to support your response. 3
- Studying foodways – what foods people eat and how they produce ,acquire,prepare,and consume them-is the best way to gain deep understanding of a culture. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...erything has happened already sometimes in past, so answers to majority of issues can b...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'happened'.
Suggestion: happened
... To summarize, events that has already happen reflects our everyday reality, so we ca...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, still, as for, for instance, i feel, as a result, in other words, to begin with, what is more, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89913544669 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.528272805 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533141210375 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.0505581312 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.4736842105 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2631578947 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.68421052632 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19041713198 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698432763151 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475899178859 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117919768481 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600966786872 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.