Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
History has a tendency to be repeated many times in a row, so we can compare events from past to modern occasions. It is why I feel that knowledge about previous times helps to deal with the present. Besides that, learning about the past makes us more learned persons that increase our understanding of life and the world.
To begin with, events of past still influence on present occasions. It would be better to say, that past has formed the present; hence, any modern event or thing contains something out of the past. This shows the intrinsic connection of past and present. For instance, this bound can be observed in traditions of nations or in current borders of countries. Both customs and nations have been formed in past and reflect the history independent of our desires not to accept this. Consequently, we are closely related to the past even if we do not notice this relation in our everyday life. This is the reason, why the present is accounted for past and present cannot be considered without past. All of that makes learning of history is essential for everyday living.
What is more, history is an unlimited source of wise of preceding generations so being aware of the past allows mankind to overcome modern challenges that humanity faces. In other words, everything has happened already sometimes in the past, so answers to the majority of the current issues can be found in the annals of history; hence knowing of the past helps us to solve problems in present. By the same token, learning about past provides people an opportunity not to make again the same mistakes as our anchors have done. Moreover, people who know about events of the past, have a more complete picture of the world and are able to make more complex decisions. This is because learned persons can take into account experience of the old outer world. As a result, this benefits of knowing history makes a contribution to the importance of knowing about the past.
To summarize, events that have already happened reflects our everyday reality, so we cannot reject them. This is the reason why history saves its meaning and should be studied by everyone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | Pandalove | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Majid1369708090 | 76 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | swapnil.paliwal | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | S_Daftari | 80 | view |
| 2019-04-24 | Shazli | 83 | view |
- A person should never make an important decision alone. 60
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- space tourism 90
- If you could travel back in time to meet a famous person from history, what person would you like to meet? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 66
- woman in a white dress belongs to James McNeill Whistler. may be written by another painter 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, still, as for, for instance, i feel, as a result, in other words, to begin with, what is more, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81132075472 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51028934382 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506738544474 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3324511834 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9473684211 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5263157895 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.68421052632 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193892191098 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711324044551 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479959035728 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11911722802 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579559191276 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.