Many students have to live with roommates while going to school or university. What are some of the important qualities of a good roommate? Use specific reasons and examples to explain why these qualities are important.
Living with others can be unbearable especially if people do not fit each other or do not have necessary traits for cohabitation. I feel that both friendliness and responsibility are the two essential qualities for every roommate.
To begin with, friendliness is one of the main characteristics that a roommate should pose. I am sure in this since studying in a school is a difficult task that requires a lot of energy and concentration to be successful. Quite often students suffer from stress or blue mood that cause by deadlines, exams, and conferences. Struggling with these hardships may undermine us so we can be in need of other's support. If this situation occurs, a friendly roommate would more likely help us to overcome a problem than any other person. What is more, we force to spend a lot of time with our roommate since we are living together. This necessary time spending will be more pleasant if our companion is friendly. For example, I lived in a dormitory with Sergey, who was willing to help at any time. He also filled my student life with joy that I have never felt lonely from my family.
In addition, carrying of responsibility is the second crucial quality for a good roommate. Humans are social creatures that cannot do everything by their own. By this I mean that sometimes we need to ask people around us to do something because of a variety of reason. For example, we may become ill, so we can ask our roommate to warn about our absence and сдать a task for us. In that case, we would wish to have a responsible roommate, for being sure in the completion of our request. For example, I was late on examination and do not have any other way to warn my teacher except to ask Sergey to do it. He warned the examination, and this action saved me from retaking the exam.
To summarize, I believe friendliness coupled with carrying of responsibility are the most important qualities for roommates.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-14 | nicktyranov | 70 | view |
| 2018-11-28 | valerii | 60 | view |
| 2018-10-20 | diegof1390 | 60 | view |
| 2017-02-24 | mgrajapt | 70 | view |
| 2017-02-24 | mgrajapt | 70 | view |
- People have different ways of escaping the stress and difficulties of modern life. Some read; some exercise; others work in their gardens. What do you think are the best ways of reducing stress? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 60
- What famous place would you like to visit? Use details and reasons to support your response. 3
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Some movies are serious, designed to make the audience think. Other movies are designed primarily to amuse and entertain. Which type of movie do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- forest fires in Yellowstone "let it burn" policy 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spending'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: spending
...ny other person. What is more, we force to spend a lot of time with our roommate since w...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, second, so, for example, i feel, i mean, in addition, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69411764706 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.896776636 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538235294118 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.0299842598 48.9658058833 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.0 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8947368421 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162788434776 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520977629837 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394761600228 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106349268879 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317276395533 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.