Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree?
There are two attitude about learning from past happens. Some people agree with it, whereas other don’t believe it. In my point of view, our present and future will be result of our past, so by learning from past we can prepare for future events. This essay will support my idea by presenting some reasons in following paragraphs.
First of all, human life is not long enough to experience everything. We experience different events during our life that some of them are happen so rarely. Therefore, if they face with similar situation in the future, they will make better decision. For instance, I had a problem with my ex-girlfriend about her clothing and appearance, which was lead to separation. That was so bitter experience, and had terrible effect on my life. After a while, I started new relationship with a girl. Again I face with same problem, but this time I used my experience and controlled the issue and kept my relationship safe.
Furthermore, some of the problems generated big loses which are not easy to compensate such as bankrupt, get divorce, married decision and so on. In contrast to people who learn from the past, the people who forget the past and do not use their experiences, loses happen for them several times. According to the recent research which done by Britain phycology institution (BPI), daily decision which making several times, and have a key role in our life. The figures show these decisions happened several times in our life, thus by learning from them, we can have better life with less mistakes. In addition, the most significant merit of learning from before is that we can trust them and use them. Since, it was based on facts and reality not assumption or illusion.
In conclusion, I agree with learning from past. Some reasons and experience was mentioned to support this idea.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | Pandalove | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Majid1369708090 | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Rashi123 | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | FA1101 | 3 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | swapnil.paliwal | 73 | view |
- television has destroyed communication among friends and family agree or disagree 98
- fake5 3
- It has recently been announced that a large shopping center may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support this plan? 60
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? 70
- People work because they need money to live. What are some others reasons that people work? Discuss one or more reasons. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'happened'.
Suggestion: happened
...s during our life that some of them are happen so rarely. Therefore, if they face with...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...ur life that some of them are happen so rarely. Therefore, if they face with similar s...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ept my relationship safe. Furthermore, some of the problems generated big loses which are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun mistakes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...from them, we can have better life with less mistakes. In addition, the most signifi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 313.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86581469649 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61600674855 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575079872204 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2921326366 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1578947368 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4736842105 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.31578947368 5.45110844103 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139379087075 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04778472643 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679642146517 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104239096689 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603690626012 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.