make decision quickly or not
Nowadays, we have many kinds of people in the world that each of them has different features. For example, some people like to make decision swiftly while others prefer to think carefully then they try to make decision. From my point of view, making decision without any hasten, would be better for you because you will be able to save your time and you can think about the issues deeply. My arguments for these points are explained as follows.
First, if you make decision quickly, you will certainly follow the wrong path. To give an example, last month I wanted to prepare myself for the English exam but I decided swiftly to go to book shops in order to buy proper books. As a matter of fact, I though that if I prepared the books early, I will be able to devote a lot of time for studying. However, the books were not relevant for my exams. Therefore, I went to shop and then buy other books again. Consequently, I wasted my time due to the fact that I make decision with hasten. Furthermore, making decision with hasten may cause harsh events for you. Actually, in some cases if you do not think well before making decision, you will face with unexpected events. For instance, imagine that you want to go the mountain climbing and the weather is not warm enough. In this way, if you make decision quickly to go to mountain without any attention to the weather, you may forgot to bring warm clothes. As a result, when you see that the place is very cold, you may get back to your home and bring suitable clothes so your time will be wasted.
Second, by making decision quickly, you will not be able to use others knowledge. In fact, using experience of others would be useful because you may consider some issues by paying attention to other people advice. In addition, you can think carefully about your decision if you refer to your previous experiences. I mean, you may experience some special events and now if you consider them before your decision, you will be able to make decision without any difficulties.
All in all, from what I have discussed, these days, most people use several ways to make decision. Some people may make decision quickly but others may think carefully before making decision. In my view, we should make decision without any hasten since not only can we save our time but also we we are able to think with notable concentration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-10 | hesami | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-10 | hesami | 86 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | sonyeoso | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | reza_fattahi | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | subashdevkota | 85 | view |
- If teachers explain advantages of subjects outside of school to their students, they will be more interested in learning about them. 68
- Tidy students who organized their room are more successful than other students 75
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant For instance humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37 C no matter whether the environment is warm or cold Because dinosaurs were rep 88
- Introduce your abilities to others in order to have successful life 63
- High salary job or job with lots of holidays 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: we
... not only can we save our time but also we we are able to think with notable concentr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, i mean, in addition, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, in my view, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58588235294 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36684831247 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456470588235 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0474874985 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5909090909 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3181818182 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 5.45110844103 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294695916242 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112969592884 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121570637614 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221783188623 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657491977546 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.