In many places students must arrive very early in the morning to attend school Some people believe that starting the school day early is the best approach to support learning but others believe that starting the school day at a later time in the morning w

There are different opinions on whether the classes should be held in the early morning or later in the morning. Even though some people think that attending classes early in the morning is beneficial to students, I believe otherwise, maintaining that since the disadvantages of early classes outweigh its advantages, it is better for students to attend schools or universities later in the morning. In what follows, I will delve into the most persuasive reasons to substantiate my perspective.

Without a doubt, the most consequential reason corroborating my stance on this subject is that students require enough sleep the night before their classes. Most of the students have no choice but to stay awake late in order to do their assignments or their other daily tasks. Even some students have part-time jobs, and they work in the evenings. On the other hand, many schools and universities are not equipped with restrooms so students can nap during the day. This makes the students, particularly those who have morning-to-afternoon classes, exhausted and overwhelmed. Therefore, this reason manifests that holding classes a little bit later in the morning benefits students to a great extent.

Although the previous reason is the first one crossing the mind at first glance, another remarkable point deserving some words here is that some students are not early-bird. Their efficiency is notably low during the early morning and increases gradually during the day. Requiring all students to come to school or university early in the morning is a stringent rule that has adverse effects on some students. Students whose perception is relatively hindered in the early morning might end up dropping the classes held at an earlier time of the day. Drawing from my experience, I remember when I was going to university, one of the required courses was offered only by one strict professor who believed that the students should wake up early in the morning. My performance is deficient in the morning, so I had to wait until the semester before my graduation to take the course that I should have taken in the second semester because it was offered by another professor that semester. Had he not had the ridiculous belief that the students have to wake up early, I would have taken that course much earlier and graduated sooner. Thus, this point illustrates the fact that making students wake up early is not only unfair, but it also may give rise to some difficulties for some students.

All in all, many people are in favor of the notion that students should learn to begin their day early in the morning. Nonetheless, the foregoing reasons lead us to conclude that early classes put so much pressure on some students and make some drop the early-morning courses.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 632, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...reason manifests that holding classes a little bit later in the morning benefits students ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, thus, even so, on the other hand, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2312.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02608695652 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80217306979 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491304347826 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.0 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8849646215 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.684210526 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2105263158 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328210870118 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107274742279 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792046566109 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219169386246 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345991025584 0.0645574589148 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.