Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave.
It’s hard to deny that movies and television which contains violence may distort young people’s value, and such fact may mislead some waxy people to generate the idea that movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined painstakingly. As far as the guide, motivation and supervision are concerned, I strongly hold that movies and television have more positive than negative effects on the young people.
First and foremost, the movies and television can guide young man to the right way to behave. It is so called the cultural value orientation. When the young generation watch TV series on history and etiquette, they can learn basic and essential knowledge of how to treat the world. As long as the characters on TV behave correctly, impressionable young people will imitate their right behaviors and behave well.
Furthermore, plots and characters in movies and TV can always motivate young people to aim high and behave well. Films and TV, as the extension of literature, are always used by directors as the innovative way to show remarkable ideology which can always be auspicious. Take myself as an example, I don’t behave well in Maths from my primary school to middle school and gradually I accept the fact that I am dump at Maths. However, during my high school, I watched the film Forrest Grump and the hero Grump’s life moved me a lot. As long as you keep running, fortune will fall on you and that’s what the film has taught me. For me, the fortune is the great progress of Maths score in high school.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that films and TV are inevitably to include violent scene to attract audiences which can cause young people to become violent. To some extent, such a statement is correct. However, it omits a indispensable character in releasing the film and TV that is the supervisor. Government has already set certain organizations to administrate the films and TV and the motion picture rating system is one of the achievements. Besides the government from the highest perspective, teachers from the school, parents and even friends of young people can play important roles in deliberately filter the inappropriate films.
In a nutshell, I maintain that movies and television have more positive effects than detrimental effects on the way young people behave. Admittedly, some people may oppose me. However, as what Henry Bessemer once said, he had no fixed ideas derived from long-established practice to control and bias his mind, I believe they will compromise after being exposed to my article.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams 85
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 81
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'dumped'.
Suggestion: dumped
...d gradually I accept the fact that I am dump at Maths. However, during my high schoo...
^^^^
Line 4, column 220, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...statement is correct. However, it omits a indispensable character in releasing th...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2259.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05369127517 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79891968867 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521252796421 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5745908432 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429091116869 0.236089414692 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119174542006 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.198718353855 0.0737576698707 269% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252303865997 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.201491926755 0.0645574589148 312% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'dumped'.
Suggestion: dumped
...d gradually I accept the fact that I am dump at Maths. However, during my high schoo...
^^^^
Line 4, column 220, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...statement is correct. However, it omits a indispensable character in releasing th...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2259.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05369127517 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79891968867 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521252796421 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5745908432 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.45110844103 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429091116869 0.236089414692 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119174542006 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.198718353855 0.0737576698707 269% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252303865997 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.201491926755 0.0645574589148 312% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.