a new theater at my neighborhood
Theater entertainment has been developed in many cities. Moreover, in order to spread this entertainment more, companies are building theaters in neighborhoods. Some people think that building a theater in my area is not a great idea because if the business fails, the building would be abandoned. However, If I were to support this idea, I would support this plan for many reasons.
First, any new investment meant new jobs for people. Moreover, looking for a job is becoming hard for cities because there have been fewer investments. However, this is great news for local people, in order to build the theater, the company will need to hire people. So, this is an excellent opportunity for people who live around to find a stable job. In addition, after the building is finished needs, it will need people to run the business. Thus, this investment is completely a good idea for improving the neighborhood economy.
Second, following this idea further, new investments in neighborhoods increase the houses prices. Thus, people who live around should be happy because their assets will grow in a while. For example, close to my parent's house, it built a theater as well, and when they had to sell the house, the price was much more than they thought.
Finally, theaters are not only for shows and actor displays but also offer other activities such as classes for different ages. For instance, at theaters, people can learn different skills like music or displaying. Again, this is a great opportunity for neighbors from children to adults to be involved in many theater activities.
In conclusion, a theater in my neighborhood can be bad for some people because they prefer to keep the same. However, from my perspective, a theater is a perfect investment since it is an opportunity for people looking for a job, the neighborhood value will rise, and people can acquire new skills.
- otters decrease 81
- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends 60
- franchise 71
- robustus dinosaurs 83
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet. They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects. What is specific to these online encyclopedias, 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98107255521 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76096791086 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536277602524 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4328600569 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7222222222 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250842645386 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833247853222 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707593204455 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153991094104 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683746332329 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.