No can deny there are both positive and negative aspect of this prompt. if i were to choose, i would definitely disagree the at the universities
No can deny there are both positive and negative aspect of this prompt. if i were to choose, i would definitely disagree the at the universities and colleges same financial support should be given to both sports and academics for a number of reasons which i will develop in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, given same financial support to both sports and academics in the university will cause unseriousness amidst the student to their studies. I have to admit my opoinin of the subject has been profoundly influenced by my oen personal experience In my previous college, the session the university decided to give same preference to both sports and academics in terms of funding, the student academic performance went down and it really affected competition of the school amidst it competitors. Had it been the university, did not gave same financial supports to sports and academics the students would still remain topnotch and the university will still be high flying amisdt other colleges.
Secondly, according same finanancial supprts for both acdemics and sports in a college, would definitely have a negative effect on research and this will affect the college ranking amidst other schools. To give same funding to sports and academics will reduce money that the college is supposed to use in funding research and when this happens, the college's ranking will come down and it might lead to the school not getting external funding. Drawing from my own experience, in my last college at a particularv semester the mangement decided to offer same funding for research and sports and this affected the money the chemistry department is supposed to get for the phd students reaserch, insufficient funding made the reaserch to be done superficially and the research could not stand side by side with researches in other schools, this cause the school ranking to drop and hence, made the school to lose funding externally.
In the light of the above mentioned reasons, i will disagree that same finincial support should be given to sports and academics in auniversity.
- However in the lecture the man disagree with this develpoment and provides three reasons to refutes each of the reading reason 60
- One can deny there are positive and negative aspect of this prompt If i were to choose i would strongly agree that it is more important to keep old frields than new friends for a number of reasons that i will develop in the subsequent paragraphs 70
- No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects to children playing computer games Some will argue that because playing computer games enhances the intellectual capacity of the children and due to this it be allowed However If i were to 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture 86
- No one can deny that there are negative and positive aspect of comparing the comfortability of life in the olden days to the nowadays life If i were to choose i would definitely agree that it is more comfortable to live now than the time of our grandparen 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'aspects'?
Suggestion: aspects
...ny there are both positive and negative aspect of this prompt. if i were to choose, i ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ive and negative aspect of this prompt. if i were to choose, i would definitely di...
^^
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... and negative aspect of this prompt. if i were to choose, i would definitely disa...
^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ct of this prompt. if i were to choose, i would definitely disagree the at the un...
^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...academics for a number of reasons which i will develop in the subsequent paragrap...
^
Line 4, column 540, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
...rs. Had it been the university, did not gave same financial supports to sports and a...
^^^^
Line 6, column 46, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e light of the above mentioned reasons, i will disagree that same finincial suppo...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09941520468 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75421834332 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46783625731 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 541.8 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.1344086022 189% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 115.293827531 48.9658058833 235% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 193.777777778 100.406767564 193% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.0 20.6045352989 184% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215004510081 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138743583252 0.076458572812 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183054062445 0.0737576698707 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180162592945 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.203229775164 0.0645574589148 315% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 11.7677419355 184% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 58.1214874552 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.1575268817 178% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.0537634409 171% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 10.247311828 215% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.