Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?
Sociologists take it as axiomatic that team working is one of the most momentous elements in every student’s life. Throughout the word, schools and universities endeavor to opt for the best approach to enhance the students' abilities in working as a team. In this regard, some people are of the opinion that conducting projects as a team and evaluating students in a group is a suitable method, whereas others might think that evaluating students by their own attempts is more advantageous. Were I forced to choose, I would prefer the former point of view to the latter one. My reasons are substantiated in the subsequent paragraphs.
The first reason worth mentioning is that team working cultivates sense of responsibility among the students; meaning, every student play a crucial role in a team as a member to achieve the team’s goal. Indeed, students learn to perform their tasks carefully to avoid any mistake. Actually, they do their best to seem responsible in the eyes of their peers. In such a circumstance, they gradually learn to be responsible in future especially in their jobs and families. I would like to mention a personal experience as a proof of concept. I vividly remember when I was at high school, my biology professor gave us a laboratory project which we had to accomplish it in groups. Each of us had different role and responsibility to perform tasks and hand in a report. Having been experienced such a beneficial work, I learned how to organize different tasks in a group and perform duties more efficiently. Later when I started my own business, I use lots of their thoughts to organizing my works and dividing different tasks among employees.
Another key point that makes me hold this belief is that team working and evaluating students in a group, offer them the opportunity of helping each other. That is, students can easily ask their peers about their problems and weaknesses. Indeed, since all the group members will receive same grade, they do not hesitate to help each other. One of my friends in a college, spent lots of his time to help me in mathematics due to the fact that we, both evaluated and graded same. Not until students help each other tackle problems, do they receive a remarkable grade.
To arrive at a conclusion, I firmly agree with the idea that working in a group and receiving same mark is a beneficial educating method due to the fact that this assessment not only cultivate sense of responsibility among students and prepare them for their future jobs but also they learn help each other unconditionally.
- 3 At one high school more of its students than ever before have been caught cheating on their homework assignments For example many students have asked other students to provide them with answers for assignments The school is considering making a change t 80
- The government wants to fund one of the following areas to improve children s education Which one do you think is better Why hire more teachers to teach in a small class make preschool education before kindergarten mandatory provide some training courses 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children should only study or play and don t have to do household chores 76
- 1 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Schools should be responsible for teaching students moral values State your opinion and explain why 85
- Which of the following do you think is the best way for a student to make new friends joining a sports team participating in community activities traveling 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 292, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to help'
Suggestion: to help
...r their future jobs but also they learn help each other unconditionally.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87899543379 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87960009438 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520547945205 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.735057982 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.85 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.15 5.45110844103 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245487972891 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681530831639 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729398594326 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153417955503 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504223032235 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.