Nowadays, many movies or films are based on books. Some people prefer to read the original book before they watch the movie, other prefer to watch the movie before reading the book. Which one do you prefer?
Movies have been intellectual nourishment feeding human’s sense of curiosity from time immemorial. I this respect, films established upon books have become more sought after in today’s world. Considering this, some people are willing to read the original book preceding they watch the movie, while some other stands at the other extreme, holding the view that watching a movie before reading the book is lucrative. Yet to the best of my knowledge, I side with the latter idea. Following paragraphs lend credence to my view.
First and foremost, reading the book before watching that movie, people can alleviate their photographic memory. To elucidate more on this issue, this is a very promising measure to improve the mental and intellectual ability of individual pursuing delirious emotion in this regard. Correspondingly, people are inspired to visualize all scenes of movies on the assumption that they are acquainted with the story. Further and more importantly, it has been acknowledged that numerous developed, industrialized countries apply this proceeding to nurture children in the near future and make them prepared to enter in the movie industry by promoting their imagination and creativity at this critical juncture of life. Scientists reveal that by reading movies prior to watching the story, people can have a better impression about special effects, cultivating them to simultaneously think for the novel ambient while watching films.
What is more, people can choose what movies are worth watching if they know its content previously. That is to say, watching some movies is merely a waste of time, sowing seeds of disaffection. In today’s convoluted world, individuals prefer to spend their leisure time aptly, so by knowing the story of movies through readings its book; they feel assured that they will be captivated by the movie thoroughly. An example drives this notion home. When I was a sophomore student, I decided to go to the movies along with my intimate friend to watch the latest Harry Potter. As I knew the whole story of this movie formerly, I was obsessed with that movie by virtue of actors and actresses, and special effects. Having said that, some parts of the stories did not cover decently, but the whole movie was acceptable. Had I not already read the book of Harry Potter, I would not have been enthusiasm to watch the film based on its adventurous, fascinating story.
To wrap it up, I have to reiterate my standpoint that reading the book before watching its movie is beneficial. This is because the creativity of people gets improved while watching the movie, and individuals can choose what movies to watch according to their understanding of the whole story.
- Do you agree that it is better to work for business owned by someone else than to work for the business of one s own family 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor. 78
- TPO1 8
- Do you agree or disagree? It is more important to keep your old friends rather than making new friends. 78
- TPO44 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, thus, while, what is more, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2285.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16968325792 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83914296681 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.2833376545 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39835451709 0.236089414692 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120588165717 0.076458572812 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110725878688 0.0737576698707 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267823894756 0.150856017488 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448803968767 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.