In recent decades, a lot of movies have been produced based on the books. Although some people are inclined to read a book before watching its related movie, I prefer to watch a movie first and then read the book which the movie is based on because of several reasons. In what follows, I will explain the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason to be mentioned is that by watching a movie before reading its related book, we can save our time. In fact, we can watch the movie and decide whether we should read the book or not; we can find whether the book is interesting enough for us to read or not. It should be taken into account that watching a movie only needs nearly 2 hours, but reading a book needs more than 2 hours, may be several days. Just consider if you want to read a book first, you should take your time commuting to the book store, finding, and buying the book; if you don’t like the book, you will definitely waste a lot of time and money. On the other hand, when you want to watch a movie, you just need to turn TV on, choose and watch a movie.
In approaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above, watching a movie helps me to understand its related book better. The majority of the books the movies are based on are so complex that it is very hard to know all of the characters' name, let alone understanding the story. Therefore, watching the movie allows me to understand the events of the book better. In fact, if I read the book first, I will become confused about events and will lose my enthusiasm to watch the related movie. Furthermore, watching the movie before reading the book assist me to imagine the story of the book better. So, I watch the movie first on the purpose that I understand the book better.
Taking all aforementioned arguments into account, I prefer to watch a movie before reading related book. It not only helps me to save my time, but also gives assistant to me to understand the story, and the events of the book better.
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor. 76
- You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her? 70
- do you agree or disagree? The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character? 70
- do you agree or disagree The way people dresses is a good indication of his or her personality or character 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...so complex that it is very hard to know all of the characters name, let alone understandin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ory, and the events of the book better.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, apart from, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33714253057 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437837837838 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4033135751 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.75 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.485746302708 0.236089414692 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191836152223 0.076458572812 251% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130593779186 0.0737576698707 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.337745195241 0.150856017488 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753016925157 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.54 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.66 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 86.8835125448 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.