Nowadays people are more willing to help the people who they don't know (For example, giving food and clothes to the people who need them) than they were in the past.
A controversial issue relating to whether people at present are more willing to help other individuals they do not know than they were in the past. Relevant authorities are urged that citizens nowadays are more likely to help people who need assistance than they were in the last decade. From a personal point of view, the above statement is agreeable for some reasons as below.
To begin with, people now are richer and possess a better living environment so that they would spend some money to help others. To be more specific, parents today usually get profitable occupations in society so that many family members could not only live in a spacious and excellent house but also enjoy a pleasing life. In this case, they would not have to worry about money that is not enough to sustain life and even give some extra funds to the people who really need help. Therefore, stable life gives modern people more choices to donate clothes or food to someone who needs them. On the contrary, people in the last generation lived in a harsh environment where they did not obtain enough money from working to support their household expenses. Under these circumstances, they would not be able to have extra funds to help other residents.
What is more, currently residents have more effective approaches to find and help people they entirely do not know. With the high speed development of the Internet, adults could check some information relating to other individuals who want monetary or material contribution and they would give assistance to those families immediately. On the contrary, people in the previous time barely knew about other people who needed help for the reason that they did not possess efficient channels to acquire messages, thus they may not be able to give them money or life stocks. For example, last year when I surfed the Internet on my phone, I found someone who got severe cancer. I sent some money directly to his account at once and with a large amount of people did the same as what I did, he was given medical attention eventually. Hence, folks in contemporary society own useful tools to obtain information about others who are in more trouble than ever before.
Finally, people at present are more sympathetic to the sad experiences of others. Everyone may have a hard condition that they really need aid from other citizens so that they would assist other people who live in a difficult condition. From what was discussed above, humans are more willing to give others warm care.
To sum up, from what was discussed above, residents nowadays are more likely to offer assistance to other individuals who they do not know because they have strong abilities to give others a hand and they could also get helpful information on the website.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the points that several reasons to explain the mass extinction mentioned in the reading passage 80
- summarize the points in the passage being sure to explain the discovery of the dinosaur described in the reading passage 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 73
- Providing Internet access is as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, may, really, so, therefore, thus, for example, on the contrary, to begin with, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2295.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8417721519 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49153259933 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487341772152 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 745.2 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7689954549 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.789473684 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9473684211 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.509053931665 0.236089414692 216% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175581493819 0.076458572812 230% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119346431906 0.0737576698707 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324825152937 0.150856017488 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892869026614 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.